Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+An\s+answer\s+for\s+K6VVA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+An\s+answer\s+for\s+K6VVA\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] An answer for K6VVA (score: 1): Author: Dave L Thompson <k4jrb@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:43:46 -0500; I tried replying to Eric K6VVA but got bumped as spam by his filter. Sorry for the band width but there are a lot of SSB Contesters out there... Eric, The best most operators do on SSB is record a se; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-12/msg00446.html (6,922 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] An answer for K6VVA (score: 1): Author: Eric Hilding <eric@hilding.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:37:47 -0800 (PST); Sorry about the filter "bump". Since some of the WL posts end up in a "v i r u s" filter trap on the Unix this is how I must deal with things. If it weren't for the Net Criminals in the world, I woul; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-12/msg00447.html (8,630 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] An answer for K6VVA (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:26:07 -0600; The biggest problem I hear with SSB contests, especially DX contests, is heavily distorted audio caused by overdriving the computer audio system, overdriving the transmitter audio input, and wildly e; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-12/msg00449.html (7,445 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] An answer for K6VVA (score: 1): Author: Eric Hilding <eric@hilding.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:32:32 -0800 (PST); Jim: Yes (I think we both probably heard some of the same stations). Maybe it's time to subsitute an RST for RS on SSB (the T part being for audio quality :-) But with all the bogus "everybody is 59"; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-12/msg00450.html (7,859 bytes)
5. Re: [WriteLog] An answer for K6VVA (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:14:55 +0000; Eric Hilding wrote: That's why PRO recording of .wav files is essential Wasn't a set of detailed recording/editing/filing instructions posted here, a few months ago? (Or maybe several months... ISTR; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-12/msg00451.html (7,587 bytes)
6. Re: [WriteLog] An answer for K6VVA (score: 1): Author: George Johnson <w1zt@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:17:43 -0500; Yes, Whitey, K1VV wrote a procedure he used to record, edit, and time "squeeze" wav files for contest use with WriteLog. Several people have tried it with some success. The results reflect the amount; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-12/msg00452.html (8,426 bytes)
7. Re: [WriteLog] An answer for K6VVA (score: 1): Author: Eric Hilding <eric@hilding.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:12:43 -0800 (PST); Tnx (all) for the info...I want to check this out. Already have a demo in process I'll hopefully put up soon. HNY... _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@con; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-12/msg00455.html (7,751 bytes)
8. Re: [WriteLog] An answer for K6VVA (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 14:48:32 +0000; George Johnson wrote: Yes, Whitey, K1VV wrote a procedure he used to record, edit, and time "squeeze" wav files for contest use with WriteLog. Several people have tried it with some success. The resu; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00021.html (7,807 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]