Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Any\s+new\s+thoughts\s+on\s+\"stuttering\"\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Any\s+new\s+thoughts\s+on\s+\"stuttering\"\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Any new thoughts on "stuttering"? (score: 1): Author: jfleming@shelbynet.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 17:42:57 -0500; I hadn't run Winrtty in AFSK for awhile until this afternoon - Now I remember why - stuttering. I had forgotten about it because it doesn't happen in FSK. I had a long QSO with a friend, and he obser; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-09/msg00149.html (8,262 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] Any new thoughts on "stuttering"? (score: 1): Author: k5zd@ma.ultranet.com (Randy Thompson, K5ZD); Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 22:50:28 -0000; After 2 years of using WL in AFSK mode, I finally got busy last night and wired up FSK. If someone had told me long ago that I could just take the same transistor circuit I use for CW and move it fro; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-09/msg00150.html (9,949 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] Any new thoughts on "stuttering"? (score: 1): Author: aa5au@msn.com (Don Hill); Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 19:29:28 -0500; AFSK sucks. No way around it. FSK is pure on and off keying. Nothing could be simpler. No RF to screw up the audio. No need to adjust your MIC gain, etc., etc. However, when my TS870 took a lightning; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-09/msg00151.html (11,959 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] Any new thoughts on "stuttering"? (score: 1): Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 21:16:08 -0400; The one thing that AFSK *does* buy you is that you will be EXACTLY zero-beat with the station that you are calling. This is because most good software (RITTY and I assume Writelog) will adjust the tr; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-09/msg00208.html (7,952 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]