Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+CORDLESS\s+HEADSET\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+CORDLESS\s+HEADSET\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] CORDLESS HEADSET (score: 1): Author: FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com (FireBrick); Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:50:56 -0600; Has anyone ever used one of those HIFI cordless headsets? How do they compare on cw? -- "There are never any bugs you haven't found yet. -- Bill H. in Chicagoland w9ol@billnjudy.com; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00425.html (6,940 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] CORDLESS HEADSET (score: 1): Author: sentek@sprintmail.com (Floyd Sense); Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 20:06:45 -0500; If you use the right ones, they're great. I have the larger Advents (think the model is 770) and they utilize a 900 MHz channel. Some time ago I wrote a short article on Eham.com on the subject and y; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00432.html (8,202 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] CORDLESS HEADSET (score: 1): Author: SavageBR@aol.com (SavageBR@aol.com); Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 20:25:22 EST; I use a set of Radio Shack Model PRO 100 and really like the freedom. They are a bit touchy to tune but once tuned, they work very well. I can walk anywhere around the house with good performance. I; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00434.html (6,741 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] CORDLESS HEADSET (score: 1): Author: clive@gw3njw.fsworld.co.uk (Clive Whelan); Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 18:43:59 -0000; I have used two flavours of the 864Mhz devices ( probably ca. 900Mhz on your side?), namely Philips and Thomson, and both were unacceptable to me. The problem appears to be inadequate input AGC, whic; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00464.html (7,442 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]