Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+CW\s+PTT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+CW\s+PTT\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] CW PTT (score: 1): Author: ki0mi@earthlink.net (Eric Raub); Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 21:11:52 -0600; When sending CW in WL, is there a way of keying the PTT using the parallel interface and HOLD the PTT closed until the end of the CW message (i.e. non-QSK). So far I've only been able to use it in QS; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00275.html (6,781 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] CW PTT (score: 1): Author: ki0mi@earthlink.net (Eric Raub); Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 23:18:56 -0600; I appreciate the responses, but it appears the answer to my question must be no considering that everyone has sent the same response. I was already using the parallel interface, and had already tried; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00320.html (8,769 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] CW PTT (score: 1): Author: kg0us@swbell.net (kg0us@swbell.net); Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 00:21:03 -0600; Hello Eric, I may be all wet here but does not your FT920 have selections for either semi-break-in or full-break-in(QSK) in the CW mode? Both my Kenwood TS-850 and the ICOM 775DSP allow me to select; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00321.html (10,515 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] CW PTT (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:24:27 -0000; Hi list I seem to have solved a problem which has bothered me for some time. Rather than use QSK when running SO2R and wear out the relay to no good effect, I set CW/PTT to command on COM port, but h; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-06/msg00072.html (7,796 bytes)
5. Re: [WriteLog] CW PTT (score: 1): Author: Kurszewski Chad-WCK005 <chad@motorola.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:29:31 -0500; The slow one is a software command sent over the COM port, whereas the fast one is a hardware signal. Hardware is definitely better, if your hardware supports it (proper cable, etc.). Chad WE9V _____; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-06/msg00073.html (8,952 bytes)
6. Re: [WriteLog] CW PTT (score: 1): Author: "Mike McCarthy" <lists@w1nr.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:29:37 -0400; "Command on COM port" means that a message is sent over the radio interface to turn TX on or off. It is subject to delays depending on the port speed to the radio and if the radio is busy. "COM RTS"; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-06/msg00074.html (8,868 bytes)
7. Re: [WriteLog] CW PTT (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:27:52 -0000; Thanks to all for the explanation, which makes perfect sense. It is thus interesting that the delay in software is virtually the same on two different rigs, but no matter if RTS solves the problem, c; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-06/msg00078.html (9,777 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]