Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Cabrillo\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Cabrillo\s*$/: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

21. [WriteLog] cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Chad.Kurszewski@motorola.com (Kurszewski Chad-WCK005); Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 08:12:38 -0600; WL does as Randy says (running 10.20). My dupes are present, but my unclaimed are not. So here is my problem. There were a few QSOs that took place on the multiplier radio that were not multipliers.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00472.html (8,364 bytes)
22. [WriteLog] cabrillo (score: 1): Author: benko@aztek-eng.com (Larry Benko); Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:56:14 -0700; Chad, Sorry for my ignorance but why would you not want to claim credit for a valid contact. Certainly you don't want the other station to possibly lose credit for this contact. I'm sure there must b; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00475.html (9,118 bytes)
23. [WriteLog] cabrillo (score: 1): Author: wt4i@brevard.net (Bruce Lifter); Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 19:26:01 -0500; In CQ WW, if the QSOs are left in, the station could be reclassified as multi-multi for violation of the 10 minute rule. After I wrote software to check for 10 minute rule violations, I ran some of m; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00478.html (9,717 bytes)
24. [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: David W Sher <davew9lya@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 10:16:48 -0600; I am getting a little annoyed at having to edit the headings on Cabrillo-formatted logs produced by WriteLog. The ARRL always kicks back my first submission; I have to reenter the contest line, both; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-03/msg00045.html (7,284 bytes)
25. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 17:49:01 -0000; <I am getting a little annoyed at having to edit the headings on Cabrillo-formatted logs produced by WriteLog. The ARRL always kicks back my first submission;.....etc.> Que?: my ARRL CW log was accep; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-03/msg00048.html (6,932 bytes)
26. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:04:02 +0000; I believe this is a legitimate complaint, especially since the "kickback" always seems to be in the header lines, for example CW-ALL-LP-MIXED will get you kicked. And the last one I got kicked back; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-03/msg00049.html (7,212 bytes)
27. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: BobK8IA@aol.com; Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:15:23 EST; I find this really intresting. Using WL the past 18 months and at least 16 contests I have never had a contest sponsor bounce anything back to me at all. Plus, every log has gotten credited properly; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-03/msg00051.html (8,101 bytes)
28. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:18:25 -0600; Version 10.46 here and no problems with ARRL submission. However, to my memory the CQ WW & WPX RTTY Contests do not like RTTY in the Cabrillo header, which is a hoot since they are RTTY contests. ___; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-03/msg00052.html (8,018 bytes)
29. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "Gary Senesac AL9A" <al9a@pobox.mtaonline.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 16:25:07 -0900; Just submitted my ARRL DX SSB cabrillo and got back the acceptance message within minutes. No problems at all. Using V10.52F. Gary AL9A _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailin; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-03/msg00053.html (8,207 bytes)
30. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Dave L Thompson <k4jrb@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:40:13 -0500; First, if you read the cabrillo standards you will get reasons for all the kick backs. Most have been corrected by writelog and other logging programs. For Example in the CQ 160 CW the term CW in the; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-03/msg00054.html (8,494 bytes)
31. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "JOHN DOBSON" <w8wej@citynet.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 02:27:40 -0000; would it, or should it be possible,, for the contest sponsors to give actual examples as to exactly what they want and would be accepted for each contest?? seems to me, would simplify things and elim; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-03/msg00055.html (10,054 bytes)
32. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 22:17:20 -0500; This communication needs to be between the contest sponsors and the logging software authors. We should not need to be involved. As been reported here by others, later versions of Writelog do not hav; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-03/msg00056.html (8,420 bytes)
33. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: DeN0RRG@aol.com; Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 23:15:07 EST; Same here. Submitted my first ever Cabrillo log and received a receipt in minutes. Gary N0RRG _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://list; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-03/msg00057.html (7,345 bytes)
34. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Wright, W5XD" <w5xd@writelog.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 06:12:49 -0600 (CST); 1. With respect to the "created by" line, please express your annoyance to the contest sponsors, not to the writelog list, as its the sponsors that require this information. I know of no contest tha; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-03/msg00058.html (9,459 bytes)
35. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "Blake M." <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 07:21:57 -0500; http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/qso-template.html Here are a few to start with. Not very interesting reading, but have fun. 73, Blake N4GI _______________________________________________ WriteLog m; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-03/msg00059.html (8,178 bytes)
36. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "DJ3IW Goetz" <dj3iw@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:08:59 -0000; Well, I've seen several examples of Cabrillos being rejected lately i.e. using WL 10.52FE and in 2005. Always it has been the CATEGORY line with a superfluous RTTY (my main use of WL) or CW or whatev; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-03/msg00060.html (9,088 bytes)
37. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "Mike McCarthy, W1NR" <lists@w1nr.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 08:14:52 -0500; The only time I have ever had Cabrillo bounce was when my PC clock was off by 1 hour and the robot kicked it back saying that some contacts were outside of the contest time period. That is a very leg; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-03/msg00061.html (8,417 bytes)
38. [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "Bill" <ak0a@kc.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 12:08:37 -0500; How do you get the cabrillo file from the Russian RTTY contest this past weekend. Mine is grayed out? TIA _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-09/msg00015.html (6,895 bytes)
39. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "David Ashworth" <fathom@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 17:54:46 -0000; Hi Bill, you can go here: http://sp7ps.pl/sp7dqr/eng/index_en.html , click on the left panel "converters". There is one that will convert the adif from WL to a cabrillo file. Best regards, Dave, NC6P; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-09/msg00016.html (7,656 bytes)
40. [WriteLog] cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "john g" <crazycuda355@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 18:49:35 -0000; Any info on how to change format to cabrillo in the worked all germany contest it is not sending in cabrillo ??? N2KPB Tnx _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteL; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-10/msg00230.html (6,283 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]