Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Clipped\s+callsigns\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Clipped\s+callsigns\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Clipped callsigns (score: 1): Author: J Young <g4kzd@iclway.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:33:45 +0000; All ? ?Is there any way that Writelog can be setup to only send the suffix of a complete callsign in the call field during an exchange e.g if the exchange is " 5NN" and I enter "G4KZD" in the call fi; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-12/msg00325.html (7,140 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] Clipped callsigns (score: 1): Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:28:26 -0600; The only time you would want to do this is if you sent the suffix wrong previously when you sent the whole callsign. Writelog does have the ability to modify what you send in those circumstances to e; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-12/msg00327.html (8,418 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] Clipped callsigns (score: 1): Author: "Ron St.Laurent ND5S" <r.stlaurent@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:13:11 -0500; With the number of people who now send "last two", I would hate to see this become the norm for a confirmation. Would that really save that much time? Ron ND5S Visit my Website at: www.qsl.net/nd5s A; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-12/msg00337.html (8,345 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] Clipped callsigns (score: 1): Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 04:43:40 +0000; -- I don't answer "last two". This is a liddish op proceedure from Nets. There has got to be at least 10,000 things ahead of this one in priority. 73 Ed ______________________________________________; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-12/msg00338.html (7,284 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]