Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Cut\s+number\s+confusion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Cut\s+number\s+confusion\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Cut number confusion (score: 1): Author: "Dick-w0raa" <w0raa@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:13:31 -0700; I agree with you, Dave. What in the hell does "NN" mean? I put it down as 99. ATT is 100 (I assume) AOO is 100 (What else is it supposed to be?) KW is 1000? K is 1000? NN is 99? I had one stn that se; /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-02/msg00134.html (7,075 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] Cut number confusion (score: 1): Author: "Norm Duxbury" <duxburyn@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:18:00 -0500; Cut numbers have been around for a long time. They were originated by government, commercial and weather operators who had long numbers-only messages to transmit. By cutting the numbers, they could s; /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-02/msg00136.html (9,834 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] Cut number confusion (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:24:16 +0000; I don't understand why there's such confusion over this. CW is abbreviated all the time: TU, K, 73, etc. There are recognized (and some not so recognized) abbreviations for numbers. You need to take; /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-02/msg00137.html (9,517 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] Cut number confusion (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:45:10 -0600; I'm not sure what this has to do with Writelog, but I very much dislike the use of cut numbers, too. N for 9 has been in heavy use for years and I don't have a problem with that, and not with K = 100; /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-02/msg00138.html (11,153 bytes)
5. Re: [WriteLog] Cut number confusion (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:59:25 -0500; It depends on the mode in use. In CW, it is normal and acceptable to use CW cut number conventions. In other modes, cut numbers are _totally_ inappropriate. It bugs me every time I print a 5NN on RTT; /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-02/msg00139.html (11,492 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]