Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Friend\s+ini\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Friend\s+ini\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:03:50 -0400; At 07:15 AM 8/26/2003, Don Cassel VE3XD wrote: I agree that the file is much too large but how can Ed determine what should be in and what should be left out? You do it the same way I used to do the; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00251.html (9,295 bytes)
22. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:17:44 +0000; Well, that certainly is a good idea except for one thing. Only about 10 individuals, in spite of my requests for logs, have responded with logs. NONE of these are from call areas 1,2,3,6,8, or 0 of t; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00253.html (9,618 bytes)
23. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: KØBX <jduerbusch@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:47:07 +0000; Maybe I didn't express myself when I said the 'Friend.ini' slowed down the qso rate in the CQWWRTTY. What I was trying to say is the 'Extra' letters in the buffer message by using the Friends slow do; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00254.html (9,341 bytes)
24. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:55:07 -0400; Ed, Maybe the number of responses you're get is telling you something - like friend.ini files have nothing to do with contesting, and, if anything, slow down the rate with unnecessary information. As; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00255.html (10,586 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]