Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Hello\s+Writelog\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Hello\s+Writelog\!\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: k6km@cncnet.com (Bill); Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 19:08:43 -0700; Hey Writelog users, Is Writelog truly a usable contest logging program? I've watched the reflector mail for a week and I'm not encouraged. Far too many problems with what appears to be dismal documen; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00291.html (8,206 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (wa9als); Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 21:39:48 -0500; There should be many positive responses to this (I sent one privately already), but this question begs the following question for thought: Is anyone keeping track of "Awards Won Using WriteLog"? Tha; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00293.html (8,090 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: martyt@pobox.com (Marty Tippin); Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 22:14:38 -0500; It's quite usable by people who aren't hung up on how their "old" logging program works. I've never used anything else and have never had a significant problem with WriteLog in any contest. I've used; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00296.html (9,728 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 22:17:20 -0500; John's got a good point. I know WriteLog has won a LOT of RTTY contests but don't know about the other modes. If there is a problem, I don't think it is so much a fault of Writelog. It seems to be mo; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00297.html (10,781 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: k5zd@charter.net (Randy Thompson, K5ZD); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 03:27:53 -0000; WriteLog is a great program and certainly not something to be afraid of! Remember, most of the reflector traffic is involved with solving problems. Those who have WL working don't need to post messag; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00298.html (9,602 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: tombaugh@discoverynet.com (Tom Baugh); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 05:02:00 -0500; It works great .. never had any problems.. have 7 Certificates hanging on the wall and that's just from 2000 and 2001 when I started contesting. But... I've never used any other program.. It's just a; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00300.html (9,311 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin (VE2DC)); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 07:31:16 -0400; Fact is Bill... people tend to post problems on the reflector, not successes... It's a good program, but there is a learning curve. I personally think it should be a lot easier to configure... not a; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00301.html (7,706 bytes)
8. Fw: [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: bob@cytanet.com.cy (Bob Henderson); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 12:09:53 -0000; Hi Bill Writelog is an excellent contest program. I don't believe a better Windows based contest program exists. Certain problems do arise from time to time, which at their root are Windows problems.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00302.html (10,315 bytes)
9. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: abriscoe@telus.net (Allan Briscoe); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 07:02:45 -0700; There's really only one answer to your question.... install it and use it !!! If you find out you don't like it - uninstall it and forget it. ...Allan Briscoe VE7XB; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00304.html (9,271 bytes)
10. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: k6km@cncnet.com (Bill); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 07:14:31 -0700; Gadzooks, what a lot of positive responses! Many thanks for the encouragement as well as some constructive suggestions! Bill K6KM; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00305.html (7,850 bytes)
11. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:36:21 +0000; -- You call documentation "dismal" when a writelog help URL is almost 400 pages long? Not to mention the hundreds of replies from our "hotshots" who have helped others. I for one agree with Marty th; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00306.html (8,480 bytes)
12. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: llindblom@juno.com (llindblom@juno.com); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:18:53 GMT; When I first bought WriteLog (spring 98??) I used it only for RTTY and stuck with NA for contesting in other modes. Then in late 99 the old DOS computer developed problems and I was forced to use the; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00307.html (9,417 bytes)
13. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com (Georgek5kg@aol.com); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:55:43 EDT; Bill, I went to WL two+ years ago and will not go back to anything else. Yes, it is a complex program, and yes the documentation is lacking at times. However, its functionality is unsurpassed in my b; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00308.html (7,857 bytes)
14. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: k9jy@earthlink.net (Scot Herrick); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:20:49 -0700; One other commentary regarding documentation - I have spent a ton of time creating a web site that allows setting up WriteLog easy and straight-forward. In fact, after I started the web site I felt i; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00313.html (8,194 bytes)
15. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: kapitspo@ra3ani.com (Paul Kapitskiy); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:31:48 +0400; Bill, There is no account for the taste, as they say. For me WriteLog is one of the best contest programs I have ever used before. I agree, that some of the things are not perfect yet, but this is a; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00315.html (8,841 bytes)
16. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com (Georgek5kg@aol.com); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:52:43 EDT; Indeed it is. Keep up the good work Scot...geo George I. Wagner, K5KG Productivity Resources LLC 941-312-9450 941-312-9460 fax 201-415-6044 cell -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipa; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00316.html (7,544 bytes)
17. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: sdyer@interlogue.com (Steve Dyer); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:06:37 -0700; Scot, I think your website is what the Writelog support site should be. I certainly hope you at least get comped on your software upgrades! Steve W1SRD --Original Message-- From: writelog-admin@conte; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00318.html (8,998 bytes)
18. [WriteLog] Hello Writelog! (score: 1): Author: w4atl@arrl.net (Sherman Banks (W4ATL)); Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 06:33:35 -0400; Oh yeah. Listen to K5ZD. He used it to a win in CQ WW CW 2001. I think it works.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00322.html (7,686 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]