Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+IC\s+PW1\s+interface\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+IC\s+PW1\s+interface\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] IC PW1 interface (score: 1): Author: "Gary Senesac AL9A" <al9a@pobox.mtaonline.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:02:18 -0800; Just got a new "toy" yesterday, an IC-PW1 amplifier, that I am trying to get interfaced to the rig and the PC. The manual says all CI-V addresses should be the same, as should the baud rates. The def; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-10/msg00085.html (8,280 bytes)
2. RE: [WriteLog] IC PW1 interface (score: 1): Author: "Dieven" <dieven@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 20:14:10 -0700; I didn't come to the conclusion you did. The PW-1 manual says that all CI-V devices have to be set to the same SPEED, but I saw nothing to lead me to the conclusion that they should be the same addre; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-10/msg00087.html (10,102 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] IC PW1 interface (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 22:30:18 -0500 (EST); Gosh Gary, I think you're making this way too difficult. I have my PROII addy set to 05H like your PRO, and 9600 baud. It is plugged into a CT-17, and the PW-1 is also plugged into the CT-17. The CT-; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-10/msg00088.html (8,260 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] IC PW1 interface (score: 1): Author: "Gary Senesac AL9A" <al9a@pobox.mtaonline.net>; Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 11:47:07 -0800; First, thanks to all who replied to my missive. A point of clarification is needed. Dick is correct in stating that the manual says all CI-V devices should be set to the same SPEED. However, my manua; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-10/msg00112.html (13,173 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]