Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+IC765\s+vs\s+IC756\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+IC765\s+vs\s+IC756\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] IC765 vs IC756 (score: 1): Author: bjgreen@eee.org (Bob Green); Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 20:11:18 -0800; Hi Steve -- Check the address. Perhaps the '756 and the '765 use different addresses. I know the '756 and the '756PRO have different addresses. If they are different, having the right baud rate won't; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-02/msg00226.html (6,565 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] IC765 vs IC756 (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:02:34 -0800; _________________________________________________________ Someone should smack ICOM's wrist over this one. Yaesu, too. Kenwood radios all use the same addressing scheme. Set up one, you setup all. An; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-02/msg00234.html (6,934 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]