Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Keying\s+Two\s+Rigs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Keying\s+Two\s+Rigs\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Keying Two Rigs (score: 1): Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:49:23 -0500; I'm really bummed out, 'cause it looks like that an external keyer is an absolute requirement to have two radios with WriteLog. I have used COM1 to both Key and Rig Control the ICOM 756PROII. I found; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-08/msg00039.html (7,764 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] Keying Two Rigs (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 17:35:05 +0000; Consider two networked computers. Lots of serial ports and even redundant logs. Computer crash doesn't shut you down. Lots of us run that way, and a second computer can be cheaper than all that exter; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-08/msg00041.html (9,032 bytes)
3. RE: [WriteLog] Keying Two Rigs (score: 1): Author: "Gary Ferdinand W2CS" <w2cs@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:51:05 -0400; Barry, Check out N1MM Logger. It's free and others have reported its capability to do SO2R closely resembles what you're looking for. A good contester friend of mine uses it when single-op precisely; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-08/msg00042.html (9,409 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] Keying Two Rigs (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 16:17:46 -0500; friend What -ARE- you guys talking about? WriteLog is FAMOUS for SO2R operation without an external keyer. Please explain again what it seems to you that WL can't do. 73 - John, WA9ALS _____________; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-08/msg00045.html (7,614 bytes)
5. Re: [WriteLog] Keying Two Rigs (score: 1): Author: Dave Hachadorian <k6ll@juno.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 15:54:43 -0700; You can route the keying line from com 1 through a relay whose coil (with transistor driver) is driven by the A/B signal on the LPT port. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Big Bear Lake, CA . __________________; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-08/msg00046.html (6,714 bytes)
6. Re: [WriteLog] Keying Two Rigs (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 21:44:37 -0500; I guess I am the only one stupid enough to bite on this thread, but I just don't understand. Why do you say that?? You can key 4 rigs on 4 com ports if you want to! Help me here, please... 73 - John,; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-08/msg00047.html (6,797 bytes)
7. RE: [WriteLog] Keying Two Rigs (score: 1): Author: "Scot Herrick" <scot@k9jy.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 03:09:29 -0000; I think it is a question of what version one is on with WriteLog. Latest upgrade has CW and Rig control on the same port. But, I don't get it either; there has to be something in the setup that is no; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-08/msg00048.html (8,187 bytes)
8. RE: [WriteLog] Keying Two Rigs (score: 1): Author: Mel <mel.martin@axare.mail.net>; Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 07:55:01 -0400; I understand what they are saying... Writelog only asserts CW on one COM port, regardless which radio is selected, which would be a problem with QSK. The fellow wants to route that keying line to 2 r; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-08/msg00049.html (8,634 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]