Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+LPT\s+CW\s+in\s+WL\s+via\s+UserPort\s+in\s+XP\s+\-\s+solving\s+the\s+addressing\s+problem\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] LPT CW in WL via UserPort in XP - solving the addressing problem (score: 1)
Author: jon@praxisworks.org (Jon Harder)
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 12:19:06 -0000
For those who may have tried UserPort without instant success, there's one more wrinkle to consider before giving up. If your Setup/Ports dialog doesn't show what you expect, some cut and try experim
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00002.html (10,560 bytes)

2. [WriteLog] LPT CW in WL via UserPort in XP - solving the addressing problem (score: 1)
Author: Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM)
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 14:29:01 -0000
Those INI files entries are populated by FPORT16.exe. Just rename the file and make your own entries. means manual 378-37F, was XP LPT of Athlon back in
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00004.html (12,262 bytes)

3. [WriteLog] LPT CW in WL via UserPort in XP - solving the addressing problem (score: 1)
Author: jon@praxisworks.org (Jon Harder)
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 14:48:31 -0000
Thanks, Steve. After following your suggestion, and getting Setup / Ports corrected from my revisions to INI, I then renamed FPORT16.exe back to its original. Not sure what else it does, but it did n
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00005.html (13,404 bytes)

4. [WriteLog] LPT CW in WL via UserPort in XP - solving the addressing problem (score: 1)
Author: w5xd@writelog.com (W. Wright, W5XD)
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 13:16:04 -0500
Its a good idea on XP systems to rename (or delete) FPORT16.EXE. It attempts to read the BIOS settings for LPT addresses in a way that only works on Windows 95/98. Otherwise it fails to read appropri
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00006.html (15,448 bytes)

5. [WriteLog] LPT CW in WL via UserPort in XP - solving the addressing problem (score: 1)
Author: scot@k9jy.com (Scot Herrick)
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 14:16:10 -0500
Wayne, Just curious - would this also apply to Windows NT, and Windows 2000? Thanks...Scot, K9JY See K9JY's WriteLog User Support Site at: http://www.k9jy.com mailto:scot@k9jy.com Its a good idea on
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00047.html (8,349 bytes)

6. [WriteLog] LPT CW in WL via UserPort in XP - solving the addressing problem (score: 1)
Author: w5xd@writelog.com (W. Wright, W5XD)
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 19:44:27 -0000
Yes, not running FPORT16.EXE is a good idea on XP, Windows 2000, and Windows NT. As of WriteLog version 10.34, FPORT16.EXE is never run automatically, so its no longer necessary to delete or rename t
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00048.html (9,853 bytes)

7. [WriteLog] LPT CW in WL via UserPort in XP - solving the addressing problem (score: 1)
Author: Carsten Esch <Carsten.Esch@APPELLO.DE>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:40:55 +0100
Hi there, for an upcoming M/M operation I am just playing around with Writelog ... I had zero problems so far on WIN98 and WIN2000 but now to WIN XP... Playing around on a WIN XP machine and having p
/archives//html/WriteLog/2003-11/msg00370.html (7,264 bytes)

8. [WriteLog] LPT CW in WL via UserPort in XP - solving the addressing problem (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <n1eu@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:08:02 -0500
FWIW, I had more consistent results with the dlportio driver than with UserPort. I wrote up what worked for me at http://www.qsl.net/n1eu/n1mm/MMKeying.htm 73, Barry N1EU ____________________________
/archives//html/WriteLog/2003-11/msg00378.html (7,710 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu