Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Logfile\s+Version\s+Compatibility\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Logfile\s+Version\s+Compatibility\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Logfile Version Compatibility (score: 1): Author: Rick.Commo@verizon.net (Rick Commo); Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 06:02:46 -0700; This past field day the club used my laptop with WriteLog V10.33C for SSB. The person who is integrating the SSB and CW logs is trying to do so with an earlier version of WriteLog. I do not know how; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-07/msg00211.html (7,290 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] Logfile Version Compatibility (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 12:59:10 -0500; history definitively Two thoughts ... one is that the setup being used to read the file is not exactly the same as the FD setup ... as to the same fields being used, or not used. That may cause an i; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-07/msg00214.html (7,698 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] Logfile Version Compatibility (score: 1): Author: Zev.Darack@banklink.com (Darack, Zev); Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 10:34:23 -0400; There was a comment in one of the release notes that you can not network versions after 10.31 with versions before 10.31 because of difference in the format in order to handle large logs. You can pro; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-07/msg00229.html (8,118 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]