Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+MTTY\s+vs\s+1\.66G\s+and\s+Writelog\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+MTTY\s+vs\s+1\.66G\s+and\s+Writelog\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] MTTY vs 1.66G and Writelog (score: 1): Author: "KD3TB" <idarack@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:08:34 -0500; I am currently using MTTY vs 1.65D with Writelog (MTTY Writelog software link). I am curious if anyone is using MTTY 1.66G (newest available) with Writelog and had any problems. Thanks and regards, I; /archives//html/WriteLog/2009-02/msg00042.html (7,505 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] MTTY vs 1.66G and Writelog (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:25:00 -0500; There is no problem using MMTTY 1.66G with Writelog. Simply point the WriteLog plug-in at the directory where MMTTY is installed. When used with Writelog the only difference you are likely to notice; /archives//html/WriteLog/2009-02/msg00043.html (8,413 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] MTTY vs 1.66G and Writelog (score: 1): Author: John Elsik <wa5zup@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:30:22 -0700; I am using the latest MMTTY 1.66G and the latest Writelog version now 10.70 on two computers. No problems here. I am running XP Pro so I can not say I can tell any difference. Maybe some menu improve; /archives//html/WriteLog/2009-02/msg00044.html (8,238 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] MTTY vs 1.66G and Writelog (score: 1): Author: Lakshman Bijanki <vu2lbw@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:17:24 +0530; I upgraded to MMTTY v1.66G with Writelog 10.70. Works fine. 73 de Lucky Lakshman Bijanki Amateur Radio VU2LBW Confluence Hunter _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list W; /archives//html/WriteLog/2009-02/msg00050.html (7,253 bytes)
5. Re: [WriteLog] MTTY vs 1.66G and Writelog (score: 1): Author: Mike <k4gmh@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:15:05 -0500; Hello, MMTTY v1.66G is working in my SO2R set-up. However, the first time tried WL V10.70C in a SO2R set-up with 1.66G got a screen telling me "Com 3" failed to open (used for FSK to radio 2). Also,; /archives//html/WriteLog/2009-02/msg00057.html (9,062 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]