Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Microham\s+Digikeyer\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Microham\s+Digikeyer\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Microham Digikeyer (score: 1): Author: "Joe Wilkowski" <k8fc@k8fc.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:09:09 -0600; Folks, I have seen a number of comments on the use of the relatively new Microham Digikeyer with WriteLog. I don't believe I have seen any comments on how well (if at all) it sends CW in conjunction; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00195.html (6,944 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] Microham Digikeyer (score: 1): Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:17:43 -0500; Joe, I haven't used my DigiKeyer in a full CW contest yet, but in my occasional use of it, there has been no stuttering. Initially I had a problem with RTTY and an occasional stutter, but I think the; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00196.html (8,452 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] Microham Digikeyer (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:21:21 -0400; Joe, The DigiKeyer does not include a WinKey keyer ... it supports only the Generates" method of CW generation. As such, it is susceptible to the typical operating system and USB delays with "PC Gene; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00197.html (9,272 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] Microham Digikeyer (score: 1): Author: g4fka@aol.com; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:49:34 EDT; I use the microKEYER with Writelog and it works fine. I'm not a CW speed man so max probably around 25 on runs and 30 on S&P but it serves my need very well and is very reliable. Geoff G4FKA ________; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00198.html (6,779 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]