Hello gang, Here is the "Readers Digest" version of my problem. I hope one of you has a solution. I have an older version of WriteLog (v10.14E) that I have been using off and on and I have the same p
--==_421013014==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed I think your only solution is a faster processor and maybe more memory. Both are cheap today so I would stop wasting
Author: Robert.Turner@ibx.com (Turner, Robert D. Jr)
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 08:11:49 -0400
16M was barely enough for Windows 3.1, even then it had to hit the swap file quite a bit if you multitasked. If you are running an OS newer that that, your 16M of RAM is a severe handicap. Bob Hello
IMHO, if you max the memory in the laptop to 48MB and run Win95/98, you may be able to get barely acceptable performance out of it. If the memory isn't too expensive, it's probably worth a shot if yo
K5DJ told me that writelog (this was in 2000) needed 64MB of RAM and plenty of hard drive to run. 128MB was even better. I have an old P100 IBM Aptiva running W 95 that has 128MB RAM and twin 1.2GB h
One of my computers is a 7 yr old Gateway P5-166, upgraded to 48K RAM and two 20 GB HDDs (came with 16 MB RAM and 1.2 GB HDD). The HDD's came with software that allowed them to be used to WIN98SE (E