Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+PA\s+QSO\s+party\s+points\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+PA\s+QSO\s+party\s+points\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] PA QSO party points (score: 1): Author: kq3f@comcast.net (Joe Stepansky); Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 07:32:54 -0400; This question appeared in the September archive, but there was no answer. I'm working the PA QSO party and the QSO points appear to be multiplied by 10. Multipliers and QSO totals look good, but the; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00209.html (7,045 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] PA QSO party points (score: 1): Author: k5zd@charter.net (Randy Thompson, K5ZD); Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 12:43:01 -0000; Yes, the PAQP score is 10x what it should be. This is done because the PAQP is the only contest in the world (that I know of) that has .5 QSO points! So WL multiplies all of the score by 10x instead; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00211.html (8,280 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] PA QSO party points (score: 1): Author: steve@slrs.com (Steve Russell); Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 08:49:19 -0400; Yes Joe, I'm seeing it too. I spent a couple hours yesterday thinking I'd set a new record for my county in 8 hours! :) -Steve, AA3ZV are before. asking!!!; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00212.html (7,846 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]