Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+PK232\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+PK232\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] PK232 (score: 1): Author: wbarby@telus.net (Wilf Barby); Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:54:14 -0800; Gil Baron wrote in reply to Jim Smith's query about the PK232. waste the money.< I have the PK232MBX, updated with DSP from Timewave which seems to copy perfectly many times when MMTTY is garbled. I; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00361.html (7,931 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] PK232 (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:44:43 -0600; --==_108756353==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed I agree that if you have a PK232 that you might wish to use it except that FSK is really an ancient form of connectio; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00362.html (12,361 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] PK232 (score: 1): Author: k0bx@qsl.net (K0BX); Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 00:57:02 -0000; The PK-232 is an outstanding piece of hardware. It works and works. Now mine is setting in it box as MMTTY has taken it place, but the PK-232 has made 1000's and 1000's of rtty qso for me. If you dec; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00364.html (8,120 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] PK232 (score: 1): Author: n0aj@worldnet.att.net (Jim Kinser); Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:35:12 -0600; This reply is truly from the Novice, "FSK is really an ancient form of connection". GL GIL es 73 I agree that if you have a PK232 that you might wish to use it except that FSK is really an ancient fo; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00365.html (9,619 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] PK232 (score: 1): Author: jimsmith@home.com (Jim Smith); Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 23:26:11 -0800; Hi Wilf, I'm using RITTY v 4.53 plugged into WL. Works very well. Tuning is VERY easy. Weak signal performance including aurora and multipath are, in my limited experience, good. 73, Jim VE7FO; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00370.html (7,719 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] PK232 (score: 1): Author: jimsmith@home.com (Jim Smith); Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 00:01:02 -0800; Hi Gil, The Timewave site does mention using AFSK cables with the upgraded unit. Doesn't say what that means, though. I gather you mean RTTYRITE. I find RITTY to be pretty good and certainly much bet; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00371.html (7,919 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] PK232 (score: 1): Author: k2qmf@juno.com (k2qmf@juno.com); Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 08:27:58 -0500; Hello All, I don't know about waterfalls and easy click however, I use a PK232 with WL and it is connected to a TS-940 in true FSK mode. It works great! RX is very sharp and clean. It is easy to pick; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00374.html (9,046 bytes)
8. [WriteLog] PK232 (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 08:03:08 -0600; --==_167460996==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed The problem is that you have no spectrum view of all the signals and you must manually tune the signal to the pass ba; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00376.html (14,914 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]