Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+PSK63\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+PSK63\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] PSK63 (score: 1): Author: gbaron@charter.net (gbaron); Date: Mon May 12 22:50:55 2003; How about an implementation of PSK63 for WriteLog. It is now in PSKCORE used my many programs and it is going to be an excellent contest mode I think, it shod EASILY surpass RTTY. I hope to see it so; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00089.html (7,608 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] PSK63 (score: 1): Author: gbaron@charter.net (gbaron); Date: Sun May 25 22:24:13 2003; I am going to ask this again since there was no reply. Please implement PSK63 in WriteLog. They already had a contest tonight and it is really really hard to use a program that is not a contest log t; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00147.html (7,572 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] PSK63 (score: 1): Author: w5xd@writelog.com (W. Wright, W5XD); Date: Tue May 27 19:40:18 2003; request noted. I did a quick google search on psk63 and didn't spot anything I would call a definitive/authoritative document on the mode. I'm not willing to allocate time to write code to a guess as; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00187.html (8,816 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] PSK63 (score: 1): Author: rojomn@charter.net (Gil); Date: Tue May 27 21:24:26 2003; Check with the writer of the core dll used in may programs. All work together that I have seen, come on it has to be out there? There is no difference between psk31 and ask except the baudrate, that; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00190.html (9,633 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] PSK63 (score: 1): Author: w5xd@writelog.com (W. Wright, W5XD); Date: Tue May 27 21:28:58 2003; OK. Are there any additional WL users beyond Gil that would use PSK63 if it were in the program? And, if so, are you willing to find out what it is or, at least, figure out who knows? Thanks, Wayne; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00191.html (8,215 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] PSK63 (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Tue May 27 21:52:11 2003; A few of us on the RTTY reflector participated to two 2-hour Sprints this past weekend using PSK63 as a test. Most of us were skeptical that it could be a decent contest mode considering we had tried; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00192.html (11,193 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] PSK63 (score: 1): Author: ae8u_1@ameritech.net (Dave); Date: Tue May 27 22:02:43 2003; Wayne,all I know about the core dll is that it was writen by Skip Teller KH6TY.My understanding of it is that it is just as PSK31 only faster.Now i'm not sure just what that is supposed to mean,but s; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00193.html (8,490 bytes)
8. [WriteLog] PSK63 (score: 1): Author: ab2e@hotmail.com (AB2E Darrell); Date: Tue May 27 22:23:46 2003; This site has a special .dll for PSK63 http://www.qsl.net/kh6ty/psk63/ You can download the .dll at http://www.qsl.net/kh6ty/psk63/psk63core.zip 73 Darrell AB2E To: <writelog@contesting.com> ________; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00194.html (10,870 bytes)
9. [WriteLog] PSK63 (score: 1): Author: obrienaj@netsync.net (Andrew J O'Brien); Date: Wed May 28 00:02:36 2003; FYI, here is the PSK63 contest info. Quick PSK63 Contest Sponsored by the K3UK Digital Radio Reflector Announcing the First Ever PSK63 "Quick PSK" Contest. This contest will use the PSK63 method deve; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00200.html (11,125 bytes)
10. [WriteLog] PSK63 (score: 1): Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com (Blake Meinecke); Date: Wed May 28 06:48:49 2003; Writelog is contesting software. PSK is NOT a contest mode. What's hard to figure out about that? Blake N4GI; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00202.html (7,469 bytes)
11. [WriteLog] PSK63 (score: 1): Author: rojomn@charter.net (Gil); Date: Wed May 28 09:13:45 2003; PSK definitely can be a contesting mode. It is BETTER than RTTY and RTTY is what it is officially. What do you not get about that? Why do you think they have PSK31 , huh??? Writelog is contesting sof; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00204.html (8,143 bytes)
12. [WriteLog] PSK63 (score: 1): Author: rojomn@charter.net (Gil); Date: Wed May 28 09:21:16 2003; FEC is not needed and not that effective in 63 F in any case, 63 should be done though IMHO. Wayne,all I know about the core dll is that it was writen by Skip Teller KH6TY.My understanding of it is t; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00205.html (8,917 bytes)
13. [WriteLog] PSK63 (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Wed May 28 09:21:53 2003; As a RTTY guy, I agree with Blake. I'm sure Wayne has a LONG wish for Writelog. Putting another one of many digital modes in should be LOW on the list. If and when PSK63 becomes mainstream, and is sh; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00206.html (8,197 bytes)
14. [WriteLog] PSK63 (score: 1): Author: k4rv@mindspring.com (Tom Sessions); Date: Wed May 28 11:42:49 2003; How about giving Writelog the capability to add at least 5 additional logging modes of the users own choosing? XMLOG allows that, has most of the Writelog features, and is FREE! XMLOG also has a supe; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00210.html (8,009 bytes)
15. [WriteLog] PSK63 (score: 1): Author: rojomn@charter.net (rojomn); Date: Wed May 28 13:32:05 2003; Not much help if it does to control the radio and generate the mode? Already you can use it to log with fairly easily if you just want to check dups. If you really want to make this change then it sh; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00214.html (9,547 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]