Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+PTT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+PTT\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] PTT (score: 1): Author: k3ww@fast.net (Charles Fulp); Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 02:08:54 -0000; Im not getting PTT operation using pin 16 on the LPT . I have selected On LPT pin 16/COMMRTS and tried various PTT to CW delays including 0. I have selected LPT1 on the Port set up. and tried checkin; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-05/msg00082.html (6,941 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] PTT (score: 1): Author: w5xd@writelog.com (W. Wright, W5XD); Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 02:56:08 -0000; I suspect what's happening is that in your Port Setup dialog, the LPT port number you have set in the DVK column is not LPT1. Said another way, the LPT port selected in the DVK column is the one that; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-05/msg00083.html (8,213 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] PTT (score: 1): Author: k3ww@fast.net (Charles Fulp); Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 21:07:13 -0000; OK my PTT is working but it FOLLOWS the keying, that is the transmitter shuts on and off as a programmed message is sent. I suspect there is a command to insert to close the PTT at the start and rele; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-05/msg00091.html (6,847 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] PTT (score: 1): Author: jbrannig@optonline.net (Jim Brannigan); Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 17:58:23 -0400; Is your rig set up break-in CW? Jim -- WWW: http://www.writelog.com/ Submissions: writelog@contesting.com Administrative requests: writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-writelog@contesting.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-05/msg00092.html (7,175 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] PTT (score: 1): Author: kk6t@joneslumber.com (Terry Dunlap); Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:56:53 -0700; I'd like some feedback on PTT options. I have PTT Control set to "Command Rig on COM port. Has anyone experienced any problems with this method? Would I be better off with PTT hardwired on a COM port; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00101.html (6,906 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] PTT (score: 1): Author: rbdrake@erols.com (Richard B Drake); Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:48:29 -0400; You don't mention how you are interfacing the COM port to your rig. You do need to convert the +/- 12 Volt TTL levels from the COM port to whatever levels are required by your rig for PTT. Most just; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00109.html (8,471 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] PTT (score: 1): Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 13:30:07 EDT; FWIW, I've had no problem controlling PTT on an Omni VI+ and FT1000MP using just the serial port on the rig (i.e., no separate PTT wire from the PC to the rig). GL/73, Barry N1EU ____________________; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00110.html (8,225 bytes)
8. [WriteLog] PTT (score: 1): Author: kk6t@joneslumber.com (Terry Dunlap); Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:53:46 -0700; The consensus seems to be that for rigs that offer it, operating PTT with "Command Rig on COM port" works fine. 73 de Terry KK6T -- WWW: http://www.writelog.com/ Submissions: writelog@contesting.com; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00116.html (6,829 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]