Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+RE\:\s+OPTION\s+to\s+Friend\.ini\s+in\s+SSB\s+test\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] RE: OPTION to Friend.ini in SSB test (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:54:14 -0800
Sorry I can't help you, but an interesting OPTION comes to mind. If it's already doable, I'd appreciate knowing. Since names are often changed in the NAQP SSB from contest to contest (I've observed i
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-01/msg00107.html (8,160 bytes)

2. Re: [WriteLog] RE: OPTION to Friend.ini in SSB test (score: 1)
Author: Richard Zalewski <dick.w7zr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:23:38 -0700
You hit it for a triple. Now for a home run think of all of the information that the TR program can keep on a call and how it is used in a contest. Name, State, etc. Sounds to me that this could be t
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-01/msg00110.html (9,807 bytes)

3. Re: [WriteLog] RE: OPTION to Friend.ini in SSB test (score: 1)
Author: "llindblom@juno.com" <llindblom@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:32:32 GMT
In relation to TRs ability to keep track of names, that is why some of us just for fun switch names from one NAQP to the next. It forces the other operator to copy the name you send instead of just u
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-01/msg00111.html (10,407 bytes)

4. Re: [WriteLog] RE: OPTION to Friend.ini in SSB test (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <na178@k6vva.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:02:53 -0800
Yikes...when I started reading your post, for a moment I thought I had posted this to the TR Reflector :-) Umh, methinks it will have to be Wayne who brings in the "Home Run" here (by implementing th
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-01/msg00112.html (8,184 bytes)

5. Re: [WriteLog] RE: OPTION to Friend.ini in SSB test (score: 1)
Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:46:28 -0600
--SNIP-- -- More and more and more.....to the point where I turn on the computer/rig and let them work the contest while I watch the tube. I'm enough of an OF that I still believe contesting needs to
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-01/msg00113.html (7,786 bytes)

6. Re: [WriteLog] RE: OPTION to Friend.ini in SSB test (score: 1)
Author: "David Hachadorian" <K6LL@adelphia.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:41:33 -0700
Dick, W7ZR wrote: You hit it for a triple. Now for a home run think of all of the information that the TR program can keep on a call and how it is used in a contest. Name, State, etc. Sounds to me th
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-01/msg00114.html (8,146 bytes)

7. RE: [WriteLog] RE: OPTION to Friend.ini in SSB test (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:02:08 -0800
For me, "tools/preset exchange from ADI file," with data from last year's log, is plenty good enough. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ I agree with Dave. And, as an extra bonus feature, you can use yo
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-01/msg00115.html (8,051 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu