Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+RE\:\s+Software\s+Memory\s+Leak\s+$maybe\!$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+RE\:\s+Software\s+Memory\s+Leak\s+$maybe\!$\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] RE: Software Memory Leak (maybe!) (score: 1): Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:43:42 -0500; I've made some general comments about memory leaks in another email, but what about the performance problem that was reported? It's not at all clear to me what the problem is or what's causing it. Al; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-01/msg00032.html (10,366 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] RE: Software Memory Leak (maybe!) (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:43:01 -0500; I noticed a major slow-down in both Save and (especially) Delete a QSO in 10.28 in the 10m contest (SO1R/CW only PII-450, 128 meg RAM). Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-01/msg00037.html (11,772 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] RE: Software Memory Leak (maybe!) (score: 1): Author: windev@inetmarket.com (Gerry Hull); Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:52:23 -0500; Again, Dick, I was the person who started the "memory leak" thread. Specifically, the problem is NOT program speed. On both occasions, systems were PIIIs with at least 512Mb ram and >30GB of disk spa; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-01/msg00038.html (7,991 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] RE: Software Memory Leak (maybe!) (score: 1): Author: mowery@shianet.org (Mark and Beth Mowery); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:03:26 -0500; Hi Gerry, There is a bug in some versions of Windows that manifests itself if you have large amounts of RAM, like you do. The operating system gobbles up memory for swap files until it actually takes; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-01/msg00043.html (8,047 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] RE: Software Memory Leak (maybe!) (score: 1): Author: clive@gw3njw.fsworld.co.uk (Clive Whelan); Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 21:18:53 -0000; I was the original complainant about slow save after the CQWW CW. The facts then were ca 2,900 QSOs in the log running a Pentium 200 with 32Mb of RAM under Win 95. Save time was ca. 8 seconds. Most r; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-01/msg00044.html (8,007 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] RE: Software Memory Leak (maybe!) (score: 1): Author: Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 01:29:18 -0000; The problems comes as allocating too much address space for disk caching. It does not chew up RAM, but depletes address space, a whole different thing. Has nothing to do with swap file. have with; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-01/msg00048.html (9,356 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]