Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+RE\:\s+WriteLog\s+digest\,\s+Vol\s+1\s+\#239\s+\-\s+14\s+msgs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+RE\:\s+WriteLog\s+digest\,\s+Vol\s+1\s+\#239\s+\-\s+14\s+msgs\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] RE: WriteLog digest, Vol 1 #239 - 14 msgs (score: 1): Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 22:30:45 -0500; I wouldn't want Writelog to do this. Sometimes when I'm running a pileup and can't dig out a complete call, I might enter a partial call and initiate the exchange with INSERT (CT mode.) For example,; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-12/msg00241.html (8,817 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] RE: WriteLog digest, Vol 1 #239 - 14 msgs (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 23:58:47 -0600; Dick, I agree, that's why I suggested it be a 'line option' ... as it may or may not have individual value to each WL user. It might be something you use sometimes, or work away from using over time; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-12/msg00242.html (9,498 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] RE: WriteLog digest, Vol 1 #239 - 14 msgs (score: 1): Author: Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 16:46:27 -0000; All of these suggested improvements make me dizzy <gr>! w.g. I wonder why if some one wanted WL to exactly like TR, why don't they simply go and use TR. "AA4NU bar -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-12/msg00245.html (10,985 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] RE: WriteLog digest, Vol 1 #239 - 14 msgs (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 13:27:39 -0500; I'm waiting for someone to ask how come Wayne can't make it look more like DOS! ;-); /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-12/msg00247.html (8,413 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] RE: WriteLog digest, Vol 1 #239 - 14 msgs (score: 1): Author: gbaron@charter.net (GilBaronW0MN); Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 13:08:28 -0600; Because TR is a DOS program, SIMPLE! By the way, I am not one that wants it exactly like TR, just have some things I would agree with others that would be nice, like moving the cursor back to the en; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-12/msg00248.html (12,218 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] RE: WriteLog digest, Vol 1 #239 - 14 msgs (score: 1): Author: Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:52:37 -0000; Good one. why use -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). To: <writelog@contesting.com> Version: 6.0.307 / Virus Database: 168 - Release D; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-12/msg00252.html (9,618 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] RE: WriteLog digest, Vol 1 #239 - 14 msgs (score: 1): Author: Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 21:05:25 -0000; Do you mean the cursor or the insertion point ? The cursor should always move with the mouse. why use cursor type space to To: <writelog@contesting.com> -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Chec; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-12/msg00253.html (13,928 bytes)
8. [WriteLog] RE: WriteLog digest, Vol 1 #239 - 14 msgs (score: 1): Author: gbaron@charter.net (GilBaronW0MN); Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 17:40:29 -0600; The insertion point of course. To: <writelog@contesting.com> To: <writelog@contesting.com>; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-12/msg00254.html (15,213 bytes)
9. [WriteLog] RE: WriteLog digest, Vol 1 #239 - 14 msgs (score: 1): Author: gbaron@charter.net (GilBaronW0MN); Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 17:41:51 -0600; Yes , of course you are correct. I mean the insertion point. To: <writelog@contesting.com> To: <writelog@contesting.com>; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-12/msg00255.html (14,817 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]