Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+RITTY\s+and\s+Writelog\s+Question\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+RITTY\s+and\s+Writelog\s+Question\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] RITTY and Writelog Question? (score: 1): Author: k0bx@qsl.net (k0bx@qsl.net); Date: 21 Feb 2001 06:22:31 -0800; I see that in the latest upgrade that Writelog will be able to use RITTY. Boy, WF1B and RITTY really was the hot setup, and if RITTY can be used with Writelog that would be wonderful. I wonder if any; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-02/msg00203.html (7,994 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] RITTY and Writelog Question? (score: 1): Author: jfleming@shelbynet.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:39:09 -0500; tooooo cheap to buy RITTY but I keep a copy of the demo on my PC for those really hard to copy dx stations. "Lite" version for Writelog. You will need to purchase RITTY v4.5 via snail mail to Brian,; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-02/msg00204.html (8,161 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] RITTY and Writelog Question? (score: 1): Author: w1zt@mediaone.net (George Johnson); Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:16:12 -0500; Joe, I used it in WPX RTTY and it worked exceptionally well. John, WA9ALS, has the correct information. You can get RITTY from Brian, K6STI, and it runs with WL10.24F or later. The instructions for s; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-02/msg00205.html (9,131 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] RITTY and Writelog Question? (score: 1): Author: k0bx@qsl.net (k0bx@qsl.net); Date: 21 Feb 2001 11:43:06 -0800; I want to thank all that replied to my question on ritty and Writelog. The ones that have used it seem to indicated that it works very well. RITTY has always been a DOS application and wasn't sure ho; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-02/msg00206.html (7,688 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] RITTY and Writelog Question? (score: 1): Author: sdyer@interlogue.com (Steve Dyer); Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:26:56 -0800; What is the advantage of using RITTY? Is the decoder that much better? Steve W1SRD -- WWW: http://www.writelog.com/ Submissions: writelog@contesting.com Administrative requests: writelog-REQUEST@cont; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-02/msg00209.html (8,892 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] RITTY and Writelog Question? (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 06:29:39 -0500; I found that the Polar detector in RITTY allowed me to copy signals that would have been otherwise impossible with WL's decoder. -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 US; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-02/msg00317.html (7,916 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]