Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+RTTY\s+\-\s+Eliminate\s+highlighting\s+after\s+DE\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+RTTY\s+\-\s+Eliminate\s+highlighting\s+after\s+DE\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] RTTY - Eliminate highlighting after DE (score: 1): Author: "David Hachadorian" <k6ll@adelphia.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:55:19 -0000; On RTTY, Writelog currently highlights any word after DE. I think this rule is more trouble than it's worth, and should be eliminated. If you are on the receiving end of a pileup, you will quite freq; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-01/msg00192.html (7,329 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY - Eliminate highlighting after DE (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:06:58 -0800 (PST); "On RTTY, Writelog currently highlights any word after DE. I think this rule is more trouble than it's worth, and should be eliminated." Only sometimes does it highlight. I posted my comments right a; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-01/msg00193.html (8,477 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY - Eliminate highlighting after DE (score: 1): Author: DJ3IW Götz <goetzlin@t-online.de>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:11:50 -0000; Hi, for me the RTTY highlighting is one of the most important features of WL. And unless you have already logged a certain call it needs the DE in front of a call. Yes, I'm aware that quite often it; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-01/msg00194.html (8,354 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY - Eliminate highlighting after DE (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:17:47 -0600; I agree with Jim. I think highlighting after DE should remain, but possibly have an option to turn it off while keeping highlighting to calls in the SCP file. Highlighting long character streams afte; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-01/msg00195.html (9,951 bytes)
5. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY - Eliminate highlighting after DE (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:23:06 -0600; I agree with Jim. I think highlighting after DE should remain, but possibly have an option to turn it off while keeping highlighting to calls in the SCP file. Highlighting long character streams afte; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-01/msg00196.html (9,948 bytes)
6. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY - Eliminate highlighting after DE (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:25:21 -0600; I agree with Jim. I think highlighting after DE should remain, but possibly have an option to turn it off while keeping highlighting to calls in the SCP file. Highlighting long character streams afte; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-01/msg00197.html (9,948 bytes)
7. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY - Eliminate highlighting after DE (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:28:38 -0600; I agree with Jim. I think highlighting after DE should remain, but possibly have an option to turn it off while keeping highlighting to calls in the SCP file. Highlighting long character streams afte; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-01/msg00198.html (9,722 bytes)
8. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY - Eliminate highlighting after DE (score: 1): Author: "Bob Crossland" <Bob.Crossland@telcove.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:19:43 -0500; I really like Don's idea. Give us the option to turn the "DE" function off but maintain highlighting calls in the SCP file. The few times that have had mini pileups responding to my call, I have witn; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-01/msg00199.html (10,650 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]