- 1. [WriteLog] RTTY Receive problem (score: 1)
- Author: rbiggar@xtra.co.nz (Ross Biggar)
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 08:32:24 +0000
- I have a similar difficulty to that described by W6FFH recently.. I find it very hard to tune RTTy signals with the tuning indicator in rttyrite. I have had problems copying a QSO in rttyrite , then
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-07/msg00133.html (7,338 bytes)
- 2. [WriteLog] RTTY Receive problem (score: 1)
- Author: jfleming@shelbynet.net (WA9ALS - John)
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 07:30:26 -0500
- Writelog has to be the best overall contesting program available, but the RTTY tuning indicators are not it's stongest point. Particularly if you are new to the RTTY mode, you might find it a little
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-07/msg00134.html (10,866 bytes)
- 3. [WriteLog] RTTY Receive problem (score: 1)
- Author: jduerbus@marz.com (Joseph J. Duerbusch)
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 13:51:48 +0000
- I have been using WINRTTY (Writelogs rtty program) since the beginning. It works very well. In fact, the tuning indicator is more acurate than any of the terminal units I have used. I always come bac
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-07/msg00135.html (12,824 bytes)
- 4. [WriteLog] RTTY Receive problem (score: 1)
- Author: aa5au@msn.com (Don Hill)
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 13:45:16 -0500
- I don't really agree with John's assessment that the tuning indicators in WriteLog are not it's strongest point (however, I do agree with everything else he has to say here and he makes excellent poi
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-07/msg00136.html (15,103 bytes)
- 5. [WriteLog] RTTY Receive problem (score: 1)
- Author: kregli@aspi.net (Keith Regli)
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:12:15 -0400
- I find tuning RTTY with WriteLog very easy. However, if I make a couple of changes in my configuration it gets quite difficult. Maybe folks are running into this scenario without realizing it. Maybe
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-07/msg00137.html (9,789 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu