Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Rcvd\s+Cut\s+Numbers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Rcvd\s+Cut\s+Numbers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Rcvd Cut Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Dave W7DPW" <w7dpw@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:11:36 -0800; I have always wondered just how to handle the CUT Numbers that are received. Should I enter them as them are sent of convert then to full numbers before I log them of edit them after I complete the c; /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-02/msg00130.html (7,551 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] Rcvd Cut Numbers (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:17:33 -0500; Convert them. If they were sent as part of a serial number, you'd convert them, right? Why should power be any different? T=0 A=1 (ATT = 100) N=9 (NN = 99) K, 1K, KW is *not* a CUT number - just ente; /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-02/msg00131.html (7,836 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] Rcvd Cut Numbers (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:19:07 -0500; I think of these as a "signature" - if the direction and signal strength match a previous QSO, and you hear the "NN" (and you have a good memory), you can sometimes guess who it is before hearing the; /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-02/msg00132.html (7,946 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]