Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Re\:\s+Serial\s+Numbers\s+in\s+Multi\s+Operations\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Re: Serial Numbers in Multi Operations (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:07:13 EST
Before reverting back to TR for Multi-Op contests with Serial Numbers (i.e SS, WPX, etc), I just wondered if anyone could point me to a solution to this problem when using Writelog. I didn't get any
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00469.html (8,043 bytes)

2. RE: [WriteLog] Re: Serial Numbers in Multi Operations (score: 1)
Author: "Mike McCarthy, W1NR" <lists@w1nr.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:59:30 -0500
I don't understand why this is an issue. As long as the exchange is recorded properly, repeating serial numbers is not a problem. Back in the days of paper logs, each station had it's own set of numb
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00470.html (9,640 bytes)

3. Re: [WriteLog] Re: Serial Numbers in Multi Operations (score: 1)
Author: Bob Naumann <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:38:22 -0600
Al, You are not supposed to work two stations at once as a multi-single. This is a rule violation. There is no reason for WL to allow you to do this. 73, Bob N5NJ == From: Aldewey@aol.com Date: 2004/
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00473.html (10,006 bytes)

4. RE: [WriteLog] Re: Serial Numbers in Multi Operations (score: 1)
Author: Kurszewski Chad-WCK005 <chad@motorola.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:49:10 -0600
He said he "started to enter a Q". He didn't say anything about working (trasmitting) two stations at once. WL assigns a number as soon as you start typing in a call. You will also see this behavior
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00474.html (11,849 bytes)

5. Re: [WriteLog] Re: Serial Numbers in Multi Operations (score: 1)
Author: bruce <bruce@ak8b.us>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:31:48 -0500
I had to check this myself but what he is doing is OK by the rules. For SS there is no band change restriction. There is also no reason why both transcievers couldn't be on the same band as long as t
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00477.html (15,664 bytes)

6. RE: [WriteLog] Re: Serial Numbers in Multi Operations (score: 1)
Author: Kurszewski Chad-WCK005 <chad@motorola.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:39:05 -0600
This is correct. There is NO band change rule for SS M/S. I can't speak for every top entry in SS M/S, but I bet the majority of the top 5 have more than one radio. And, like any other contest, you c
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00479.html (17,750 bytes)

7. Re: [WriteLog] Re: Serial Numbers in Multi Operations (score: 1)
Author: dl6jz@t-online.de
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:46:56 +0100 (CET)
Hi Bob, you are not fully right. Think of the WAEDC. In the MOST category there are several transmitters TRANSMITTING at the SAME MOMENT allowed. The 2nd, 3rd,.. transmitter are allowed to work mults
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00487.html (12,289 bytes)

8. Re: [WriteLog] Re: Serial Numbers in Multi Operations (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:50:17 +0000
bruce wrote: Now, why can't Writelog handle this? It's networked and certainly knows that there was another Q with the number it's using. It certainly should be possible to handle this although it mi
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00492.html (9,531 bytes)

9. Re: [WriteLog] Re: Serial Numbers in Multi Operations (score: 1)
Author: "Mel Martin" <mel.martin@axare.mail.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:09:54 -0500
Large and fast are relative terms. The amount of data to be transferred to accomplish this would be of no consequence with even a 10MHz Ethernet connection. I'm sure it could be done relatively easil
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00494.html (8,942 bytes)

10. Re: [WriteLog] Re: Serial Numbers in Multi Operations (score: 1)
Author: "M. Edward Wilborne III" <wilborne@mew3.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:13:17 -0500
I disagree. I think the problem is the lack of use of database technology. Instead of using a database, such as mySQL (SQL server softare which is free), the logging applications are "broadcasting" t
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00497.html (11,241 bytes)

11. Re: [WriteLog] Re: Serial Numbers in Multi Operations (score: 1)
Author: bruce <bruce@ak8b.us>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 08:39:14 -0500
No, it's not a problem otherwise. It's a multi-single problem only. It's also only a problem when a multi-single uses multiple transcievers - a rare situation. Contests with other multi categories (l
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-12/msg00012.html (9,026 bytes)

12. Re: [WriteLog] Re: Serial Numbers in Multi Operations (score: 1)
Author: Richard Zalewski <dick.w7zr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 06:48:03 -0700
Bruce et. al., Two transceivers is not a "rare situation" in multi-single. Consider: A run station and a mult station. Been doing it that way for years and many others in same setup. Tnx es 73 Dick W
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-12/msg00013.html (10,005 bytes)

13. RE: [WriteLog] Re: Serial Numbers in Multi Operations (score: 1)
Author: "Chris Burbanks" <g3sjj@btinternet.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:02:30 -0000
Exactly Dick. This is just the case in the IOTA Contest. Chris G3SJJ --Original Message-- From: writelog-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:writelog-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Richard Zalewski S
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-12/msg00014.html (11,287 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu