Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+SO2R\s+contesting\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+SO2R\s+contesting\s+question\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] SO2R contesting question (score: 1): Author: rkenwood@erols.com (Ron Kenwood); Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 14:05:18 -0400; I have been envious of the folks who use Writelog to do SO2R contesting. I have never pursued it because my assumption has been that it is not feasible on a small suburban type property. If I assume; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-06/msg00050.html (8,068 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] SO2R contesting question (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 21:57:27 -0000; Hi Ron, I'm replying to the reflector, cuz I think it may interest many. I guess it depends how you define small suburban lot. DO you have room for a tower? I'm not on a small lot, but I only have on; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-06/msg00052.html (9,812 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] SO2R contesting question (score: 1): Author: flgrossman@earthlink.net (Frank Grossman (WB2BXO)); Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:09:12 -0400; Off topic comment on the back yard vertical issue... Ground mounted verticals just don't really work for 20 Mtrs and up. I read on some newsgroup eons ago that the physics of the antenna means it won; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-06/msg00056.html (11,512 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] SO2R contesting question (score: 1): Author: AD6E@aol.com (AD6E@aol.com); Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:36:14 EDT; Frank, Check out http://www.k2kw.com for info on how to use verticals. The issue isn't really the band, its ground loss. thats why verticals are poor on the ground, a little better on the roof, and h; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-06/msg00061.html (9,145 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] SO2R contesting question (score: 1): Author: jbrannig@optonline.net (Jim Brannigan); Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 19:11:45 -0400; I have been fooling around with ground mounted verticals for years (and dipoles and Yagis) The view that they "radiate in all directions poorly" is generally true.... Ground conductivity is crucial.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-06/msg00068.html (10,095 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] SO2R contesting question (score: 1): Author: flgrossman@earthlink.net (Frank Grossman (WB2BXO)); Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 00:15:48 -0400; That matches my experience with my ground mounted vertical pretty closely. And thanks to Al for the K2KW link... 73, Frank true.... issue can Brooklyn I evening), DX'ing -- WWW: http://www.writelog.c; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-06/msg00072.html (11,327 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] SO2R contesting question (score: 1): Author: AD6E@aol.com (AD6E@aol.com); Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:24:53 EDT; Jim (et all); Not to belabor a point, but I thought a quickie expansion of vertical problem might help: Ground losses are not just 1/4 wavelength from the antenna. Good radials take care of that. As; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-06/msg00077.html (8,945 bytes)
8. [WriteLog] SO2R contesting question (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 21:40:59 -0500; Ron et al, I live on a small suburban type property. I have a two Rohn 25 towers that are attached to the house and only 20 feet apart at most. I do SO2R RTTY in just about every RTTY contest. I thin; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-06/msg00083.html (11,511 bytes)
9. [WriteLog] SO2R contesting question (score: 1): Author: n3hs@qsl.net (Stan Staten); Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 10:42:17 -0400; That may well be the case, but never-the-less I have found verticals with a GOOD ground to work rather well. Most of the problems that I have seen have been associated with ground losses as my first; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-06/msg00112.html (13,227 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]