Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Serial\s+Numbers\s+with\s+networked\s+PCs\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Serial Numbers with networked PCs (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 16:03:08 -0000
I could use a little help from a kindly reflectee. I usually run SO2R with a single PC but the Pafos Radio Club gang will use my station for the IOTA contest next weekend. Consequently, I have reconf
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00144.html (7,721 bytes)

2. Re: [WriteLog] Serial Numbers with networked PCs (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Senesac AL9A" <al9a@pobox.mtaonline.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:36:04 -0800
No expert here on Multi stations, but I have seen considerable chatter on the reflector concerning the topic of serial numbers. The short answer is there is no setting in WL to keep the serial number
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00147.html (11,032 bytes)

3. Re: [WriteLog] Serial Numbers with networked PCs (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:52:54 -0000
Gary My sincere thanks for taking the time to explain the current position to me. I understand quite well, the complexities of serial number management in a multiple transmitter environment. There ha
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00148.html (8,764 bytes)

4. Re: [WriteLog] Serial Numbers with networked PCs (score: 1)
Author: "rsmorris" <rsmorris@att.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:07:27 -0400
Good explanation Gary. The other way to look for totals is Window/Band Summary The other point is that if your going to send in a Cabrillo file, the, log checking computer will pick up all QSO's.. Go
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00149.html (11,644 bytes)

5. Re: [WriteLog] Serial Numbers with networked PCs (score: 1)
Author: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:27:01 +0000
Hi Gary: Unfortunately, WAE DOES require sequential serial numbers between the main (run) and multiplier stations. They also don't accept serial numbers by band. So, this is not a non-existent proble
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00151.html (7,278 bytes)

6. Re: [WriteLog] Serial Numbers with networked PCs (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:25:02 +0000
-- Please keep in mind that I wrote contest programs on a Trash 80 back from 78 to 80. All in pure machine language, using a compiler of course. And my dupe algorithm on a 1.8 mHz machine will still
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00152.html (7,759 bytes)

7. Re: [WriteLog] Serial Numbers with networked PCs (score: 1)
Author: <steve@stevebb.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:54:54 +0100
There is one logging program that as soon as either the RUN or MULT station types the first letter of a callsign it will grab that serial number and regardless when the ENTER key is pressed that seri
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00153.html (8,830 bytes)

8. Re: [WriteLog] Serial Numbers with networked PCs (score: 1)
Author: "W. Wright, W5XD" <w5xd@writelog.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:10:18 -0000
The information on this thread is not quite accurate. WriteLog does not ignore networked stations when assigning serial numbers. But it only takes into account Q's that have already been logged when
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00154.html (9,438 bytes)

9. Re: [WriteLog] Serial Numbers with networked PCs (score: 1)
Author: George Johnson <w1zt@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:44:43 -0400
The rerun of this thread makes me wonder if the contest sponsors: 1. Are truly "living in a cave" and do not realize that some modern practitioners, who want to use multiple everything to be more com
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00155.html (9,484 bytes)

10. Re: [WriteLog] Serial Numbers with networked PCs (score: 1)
Author: "G3SJJ" <g3sjj@btinternet.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:50:37 +0100
I don't think so George but I think equipment, software and operating skills have moved on quite rapidly in recent years. Initially when the IOTA contest rules were drafted, there was only really CT
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00156.html (12,621 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu