Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+TX\s+audio\s+Kenwood\s+950S\s+Interface\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+TX\s+audio\s+Kenwood\s+950S\s+Interface\s+\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] TX audio Kenwood 950S Interface ? (score: 1): Author: wb3fsr@comcast.net (Peter's Mail); Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 10:03:13 -0500; Hi folks, Looking for input (no pun) on best way to interface TX audio from computer sound card with TS950-S - I have the radio shack xfomer 1K:8 ohm - I also want to use my Heil Pro head Set and or; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00294.html (7,508 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] TX audio Kenwood 950S Interface ? (score: 1): Author: joed@voyager.net (Joe Dubeck); Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 10:28:08 -0600; REN: I think your 1K:8 ohm xformer is the problem. I use the Radio Shack 270-054 Ground Loop Isolator xformers between my sound card line output and my TS-950-SDX phone patch input and I have plenty; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00299.html (8,295 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] TX audio Kenwood 950S Interface ? (score: 1): Author: llindblom@juno.com (Larry L Lindblom); Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 15:52:08 +0000; The Radio Shack isolation transformers I'm using are part # 273-1374 and they work fine with no level problems. Has RS changed part numbers or do they have more than one model? This one is 1:1 turn r; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00320.html (8,667 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] TX audio Kenwood 950S Interface ? (score: 1): Author: w1nr@eecorp.com (Mike McCarthy, W1NR); Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:10:17 -0500; Use the 13 pin data connector for audio in and out. See http://www.qsl.net/k0bx/ Works great on both my 850 and 950. Fully interchangeable. 73 de Mike, W1NR Hi folks, Looking for input (no pun) on be; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00321.html (8,303 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] TX audio Kenwood 950S Interface ? (score: 1): Author: w1nr@eecorp.com (Mike McCarthy, W1NR); Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:49:18 -0500; One other thing...K0BX says his interface is for "digital" modes. It works just as well for the SSB keyer as well. I still prefer the 850 direct FSK input for RTTY TX. However, my 950SD is "reversed"; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00322.html (9,233 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] TX audio Kenwood 950S Interface ? (score: 1): Author: joed@voyager.net (Joe Dubeck); Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:12:07 -0600; Larry I don't know if they are the same. Mine are black pill bottle sized double one-to-one transformers (for stereo) with leads at both ends terminated with RCA phono plugs. I think they're made for; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00324.html (9,417 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] TX audio Kenwood 950S Interface ? (score: 1): Author: wb3fsr@comcast.net (Peter's Mail); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:50:03 -0500; Joe, Thanks for the info.... It worked like a charm with the phone patch input - Received excellent audio comments in the contest this past weekend. 73 REN WB3FSR [mailto:writelog-admin@contesting.co; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00394.html (10,646 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]