Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Tuning\s+the\s+Rig\s+by\s+Clicking\s+on\s+Spots\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Tuning the Rig by Clicking on Spots? (score: 1)
Author: "Mack" <mccormick_mack@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 15:12:09 -0400
When I double click on a spot in WriteLog, most of the time the rig will tune to the new spot for less than a second and then go back to where it started. Double clicking on the same spot a second ti
/archives//html/WriteLog/2009-03/msg00035.html (6,901 bytes)

2. [WriteLog] Tuning the Rig by Clicking on Spots? (score: 1)
Author: "Mack" <mccormick_mack@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:04:03 -0400
I've had private emails from two other users with the identical situation. Is it possible to get a bug fix? Is additional detail needed to construct a bug fix? Thanks in advance. 73, Mack de WB4MAK _
/archives//html/WriteLog/2009-03/msg00037.html (7,560 bytes)

3. [WriteLog] Tuning the Rig by Clicking on Spots? (score: 1)
Author: "k0bx@arrl.net" <k0bx@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
At our club station we just received two Icom Pro-3 and doing last weekend I notice the samething about the double click to get the bandmap spots to change the rig frequency. What I did was in the se
/archives//html/WriteLog/2009-03/msg00038.html (9,043 bytes)

4. Re: [WriteLog] Tuning the Rig by Clicking on Spots? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric - VE3GSI" <ve3gsi@sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:32:42 -0400
Hi Mack, Somehow I missed your original post. I see Joe offered one good suggestion. With the Icom rigs, AUTO baud or speed is not a good choice with WL as with some other programmes. The other thing
/archives//html/WriteLog/2009-03/msg00039.html (9,059 bytes)

5. Re: [WriteLog] Tuning the Rig by Clicking on Spots? (score: 1)
Author: "Mack" <mccormick_mack@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 19:51:11 -0400
It looks like your suggestion was the fix! I changed WriteLog is 57 kbs and all seems to be fine. Much better response and the spots don't seem to bounce! I did make one other change. I changed, in m
/archives//html/WriteLog/2009-03/msg00040.html (10,232 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu