- 1. [WriteLog] Win2000 Question (score: 1)
- Author: "jebrown" <W4LC@fuse.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 13:29:12 -0000
- I am using the KAM+. I also have a dual-boot system with WIN98 and WIN2000. All works well when using WIN98. However, when using WIN2000, the KAM will not initialize. The Writelog.ini file looks iden
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00263.html (6,585 bytes)
- 2. Re: [WriteLog] Win2000 Question (score: 1)
- Author: dl6jz@t-online.de
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 06:33:26 +0100 (CET)
- Hi Jim, I am running Win2000 on all my computers. And the KAM is operating ok with WriteLog. The only problem I have - and there is no difference to Win98 - sometimes the KAM doesn't initialize at th
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00277.html (7,709 bytes)
- 3. [WriteLog] WIN2000 Question (score: 1)
- Author: "JE Brown" <W4LC@fuse.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:59:33 -0000
- A bit more elaboration on my previous question. I am using the KAM+. This initializes and comes up every time under WIN98. However, when I boot up with WIN2000 (same PC, dual boot OSs), the KAM will
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00286.html (7,975 bytes)
- 4. Re: [WriteLog] WIN2000 Question (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Naumann - N5NJ <n5nj@gte.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:21:26 -0600
- The key may be what speed the KAM defaults to. Perhaps it's different from what your Win2k install of Writelog is configured for? If it's not running at the same speed as you are "talking" it won't r
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00287.html (8,947 bytes)
- 5. Re: [WriteLog] WIN2000 Question (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 20:10:51 +0000
- I've got a couple of KAM+s also, but not in use now. If I remember correctly, Pacterm sets the KAM into another mode from the original state. Which is why you're seeing WL OK after Pacterm runs. Gues
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00306.html (7,895 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu