- 1. [WriteLog] WL bug (score: 1)
- Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:28:38 -0400
- Seems that the RTTY callsign capture routine is not working, unless the call is already in the super-check partial file. I believe it used to capture the call if preceeded by DE ? Barry-- Barry Kutne
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-09/msg00228.html (7,109 bytes)
- 2. Re: [WriteLog] WL bug (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:38:27 -0700
- On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:28:38 -0400, "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com> wrote: _________________________________________________________ It worked for me with just DE. Saw it numerous times. I'm using an
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-09/msg00231.html (6,952 bytes)
- 3. Re: [WriteLog] WL bug (score: 1)
- Author: llindblom@juno.com
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:27:39 GMT
- Before, I lost the entire log this happened to me once. When it did I closed and restarted WriteLog and DE again highlighted the call. Running version 10.40 something. W0ETC -- "Barry " <w2up@mindspr
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-09/msg00234.html (7,613 bytes)
- 4. Re: [WriteLog] WL bug (score: 1)
- Author: "Jason Armentrout - N4DSL" <n4dsl@atrs.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:29:19 -0400 (EDT)
- I had the same problem, and I had shut down the program and restarted it a couple times during the contest and still had the problem. I am using the latest version 10.42B, maybe I should go back a c
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-09/msg00237.html (8,896 bytes)
- 5. Re: [WriteLog] WL bug (score: 1)
- Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:15:22 -0500
- It doesn't always highlight the callsign after DE like it should. I think it used to. I've not complained since it works "most" of the time and "most" of the calls are in the database anyway - well,
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-09/msg00249.html (8,686 bytes)
- 6. Re: [WriteLog] WL bug (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 04:24:50 +0000
- Well, my first thought is I can generate a database which has every conceivable call in the world in it. Of course, it would be useless because of the size. And by adding in every log for the last 3
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-09/msg00253.html (8,106 bytes)
- 7. Re: [WriteLog] WL bug (score: 1)
- Author: dl6jz@t-online.de
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:50:25 +0200 (CEST)
- Hi Ed, may be my English is not good enough and there is a missunderstanding on my side. But you don't have to type a call if it is not highlighted. You may click with the mouse on the first! sign of
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-09/msg00256.html (8,073 bytes)
- 8. Re: [WriteLog] WL bug (score: 1)
- Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 06:54:46 -0500
- Maybe every conceivable call would be a problem, but how much problem is size really? I used to think the old one was sort of silly since it undoubtedly had a lot of unused calls, and I thought it mi
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-09/msg00258.html (9,492 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu