Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+WriteLog\s+upgrade\s+policy\-\s+upDATES\s+or\s+upGRADES\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] WriteLog upgrade policy- upDATES or upGRADES? (score: 1)
Author: khufford@erols.com (Kent Hufford)
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 01:18:26 -0000
I'm confused. The below message talks about upDATES and upGRADES.. Are "updates" going to be still part of the cost of the basic software? And "upgrades" subject to this new "yearly" fee? Even Micros
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00117.html (13,147 bytes)

2. [WriteLog] WriteLog upgrade policy- upDATES or upGRADES? (score: 1)
Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU)
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 21:33:37 -0500
Seems clear, and sensible, to me. After a year's ownership, you pay an annual subscription fee of $30 if you want ANY new software - upgrades, updates, whatever. I hope the new revenue stream will af
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00118.html (7,939 bytes)

3. [WriteLog] WriteLog upgrade policy- upDATES or upGRADES? (score: 1)
Author: rbdrake@erols.com (Richard B Drake)
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 21:45:22 -0500
Well, I am probably going to start a flame session here but we all know by now that Microsoft (and all others) provides about 1 year of bug fix updates. They fix only the most glaring of the errors.
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00119.html (16,898 bytes)

4. [WriteLog] WriteLog upgrade policy- upDATES or upGRADES? (score: 1)
Author: k1uq@email.msn.com (MorseCode2000)
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 22:20:56 -0500
Very cleanly phrased. Quit griping people, you spend more than that on junk food, crappy coffee, etc. in a year. Cut back on the swill, spend the 30 bucks, lose a few pounds, and be in better shape f
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00121.html (9,143 bytes)

5. [WriteLog] WriteLog upgrade policy- upDATES or upGRADES? (score: 1)
Author: ea3gip@pobox.com (Fidel Leon)
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 13:49:43 +0100
** REPLY SEPARATOR ** junk Hummm... It would be a very good WL feature allowing the operator loosing some pounds.... Well, I really would appreciate it (5' 8" high and over 235 pounds hi!). And, abou
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00127.html (7,827 bytes)

6. [WriteLog] WriteLog upgrade policy- upDATES or upGRADES? (score: 1)
Author: N5SMQ@aol.com (N5SMQ@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 23:59:55 EST
Was there ever a reply to this post??? Or did I miss it??? N5SMQ <<<<<I'm confused. The below message talks about upDATES and upGRADES.. <<<<<Are "updates" going to be still part of the cost of the b
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00246.html (8,030 bytes)

7. [WriteLog] WriteLog upgrade policy- upDATES or upGRADES? (score: 1)
Author: les.peters@ne.arris-i.com (Les Peters)
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:46:53 -0500
Kent, I was confused as well and decided to call Ron (K5DJ) yesterday and ask him how he plans on supporting 10.22B/C (i.e. bug fixes). Ron made it perfectly clear that for those who are happy with t
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00247.html (9,163 bytes)

8. [WriteLog] WriteLog upgrade policy- upDATES or upGRADES? (score: 1)
Author: ldh3@cornell.edu (Laurence 'Mike' Hammer)
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 13:04:26 -0500
One important clarification to what N5SMQ included, below. Even the "mighty M$" (pronounced "micro-dollar") totally abandons programs and OSes after they're not worth the support headache. You can't
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00248.html (10,000 bytes)

9. [WriteLog] WriteLog upgrade policy- upDATES or upGRADES? (score: 1)
Author: ve9wh@nbnet.nb.ca (The Irvine's)
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:22:20 -0500
You guys must be nuts trying to compare Wayne and Ron to Microsoft. Everyone knows if you want a good product you pay for support. If you don't pay.... no support, Get Over IT. Writelog is still the
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00249.html (9,213 bytes)

10. [WriteLog] WriteLog upgrade policy- upDATES or upGRADES? (score: 1)
Author: N5SMQ@aol.com (N5SMQ@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 23:02:21 EST
I wish everyone would go back to my original post and re-read it.... All I asked is if Kent ever got any replys to his post..... I didn't ask to be berated or miss quoted. Sorry I even asked.... GEEZ
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00259.html (7,793 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu