Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Writelog\'s\s+Future\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Writelog's Future (score: 1)
Author: "Aleksander Otulak" <sp2ewq@wp.pl>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:55:47 +0100
Hi Guys, I bought Writelog a week ago having decided to do so basis a general opinion it is the best software for digitally transmitted contests. However, on opening it I was shocked as, according to
/archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00174.html (7,374 bytes)

2. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog's Future (score: 1)
Author: "Wolf, DL6JZ" <dl6jz@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:15:14 +0100
Hi Alec, sri about your meaning on WriteLog. I have been using this software for several years. I tried other software also and came back to WriteLog every time. If you are missing digital contests l
/archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00176.html (9,147 bytes)

3. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog's Future (score: 1)
Author: "Filip Poverud" <Filip.Poverud@ergogroup.no>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:27:43 +0100
You could always use multipsk HI -- 73 de LB1UE Hi Alec, sri about your meaning on WriteLog. I have been using this software for several years. I tried other software also and came back to WriteLog e
/archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00177.html (9,755 bytes)

4. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog's Future (score: 1)
Author: Mark Klocksin <mpklocksin@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:13:53 -0600
We certainly could use a DigPan (or similar) plug in for PSK-31. Ideally, this would be integrated with WriteLog as elegantly as MMTTY is for RTTY. This functionality is currently a major weakness of
/archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00178.html (9,176 bytes)

5. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog's Future (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:58:29 -0500
Why don't you write the wrapper for MMVARI just as someone else did for MMTTY many years ago? MMVARI is available as an OCX and only needs the appropriate interface for WriteLog to use is as a "load
/archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00180.html (9,935 bytes)

6. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog's Future (score: 1)
Author: Mark Klocksin <mpklocksin@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:27:50 -0600
Would if I could, Joe. Good to hear it's possible. Maybe someone with more knowledge than I will pick up the challenge. Thanks for the information. 73, Mark WA9IVH ___________________________________
/archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00183.html (10,903 bytes)

7. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog's Future (score: 1)
Author: "Alec Otulak" <sp2ewq@wp.pl>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:01:06 +0100
Hi, it is perhaps worth bearing in mind that modern rigs also offer excellent filtering so 'pumping the AGC' sounds somehow 'out of tune' to my ear. Yours, Alec/SP2EWQ Would if I could, Joe. Good to
/archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00186.html (12,652 bytes)

8. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog's Future (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:53:13 -0500
Pumping the AGC is ALWAYS a factor if the receiver IF bandwidth is greater than the bandwidth of the desired signal. When operating PSK31 with a 3 KHz IF bandwidth and "panoramic" (e.g. waterfall) d
/archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00191.html (13,818 bytes)

9. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog's Future (score: 1)
Author: "Alec Otulak" <sp2ewq@wp.pl>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:30:59 +0100
Phil, As I seem to have recovered after the CQ-WW I want You to know I have replied to Your further message. However, I cannot see it posted at all. In my reply I have suggested implementation of the
/archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00230.html (12,039 bytes)

10. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog's Future (score: 1)
Author: "Filip Poverud" <Filip.Poverud@ergogroup.no>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:24:26 +0100
I would like to tell you about my self. I'm 32 years old. Born in Poland, citizen of Norway. Working as a Senior Consultant on CRM/MiddleWare solutions. I have a strong developer bacground and my edu
/archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00231.html (14,219 bytes)

11. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog's Future (score: 1)
Author: "Byron Lichtenwalner" <w3wkr@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:07:52 -0500
Dear Filip While logging contest calls is perhaps the fundamental application WL, there are many others that make me a better contester. Examples:New multiplier recognition, efficient running of two
/archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00232.html (18,049 bytes)

12. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog's Future (score: 1)
Author: Dave Sublette <k4to@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:32:14 -0500
Hello all, I can understand where Filip is coming from, given that he is a competent programmer. However, I am not happy that I have to enter a long (very long) .ini file to set transverter offsets,
/archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00233.html (19,635 bytes)

13. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog's Future (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@longlines.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:59:45 -0600
Alec, I don't think any of us really know WHAT you want. Fldigi looks like a general purpose multi mode digital program. If that is what you want, run it. Writelog is a contest logging program. A dif
/archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00234.html (14,304 bytes)

14. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog's Future (score: 1)
Author: "Alec Otulak" <sp2ewq@wp.pl>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 06:14:40 +0100
Jim. take it easy. In case You do not realise, nowaday's Writelog is not contest software. It is selected mode-/selected-contest software. Believe me, there is something more to contesting than CW an
/archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00241.html (15,355 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu