- 1. [WriteLog] Writelog & RITTY (score: 1)
- Author: du3nxe@mozcom.com (Chuck Kresge)
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:03:19 +0800
- For Writelog plus RITTY users I recently upgraded Writelog to version 10.25M and RITTY to version 4.5 so I could use them together. But I have not been able to do so. In accordance with the Writelog
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00149.html (8,752 bytes)
- 2. [WriteLog] Writelog & RITTY (score: 1)
- Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU)
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:34:28 -0500
- Chuck and others... W1ZT is the only one I know of that has successfully used RITTY with WriteLog in actual contest conditions (there may be others I just don't know of them). I tried RITTY with Writ
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00150.html (11,502 bytes)
- 3. [WriteLog] Writelog & RITTY (score: 1)
- Author: DF3IAL@t-online.de (Anders Larsson)
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:24:39 +0200
- Don, Different opinion: In my location with a high local noise level and with my invisible dipoles on the balcony signals are often marginal. I have been using RITTY on a laptop and WriteLog with RTT
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00154.html (13,512 bytes)
- 4. [WriteLog] Writelog & RITTY (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C)
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 08:12:19 -0400
- I used it successfully in the CQRJ WPX contest to work over 900 stations (WL 10.24 and RITTY 4.50). But I have not tried with the most recent version of WL (10.25 now 10.26) and have never had the BS
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00155.html (7,833 bytes)
- 5. [WriteLog] Writelog & RITTY (score: 1)
- Author: gbright@bellsouth.net (Grant Bright, Ph.D.)
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 19:05:02 -0400
- Hi Andy and ListMates, Thanks for your post about RITTY. It was very interesting and timely for me. I very much agree with you about using good DOS programs. Your situation is most interesting becaus
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00159.html (11,472 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu