Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+correct\s+way\s+to\s+handle\s+dupes\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+correct\s+way\s+to\s+handle\s+dupes\?\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] correct way to handle dupes??? (score: 1): Author: w9ol@dataflo.net (Bill Heinzinger); Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 20:57:04 -0600; I worked two dupes that were simpler to work than argue. So I went to the first qso with each dupe and marked them as "Unclaimed". The points disappeared. But the second qso's retained the D but did; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-02/msg00126.html (7,265 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] correct way to handle dupes??? (score: 1): Author: raj@logicresources.com (Raj VE6RAJ); Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 22:40:12 -0700; Hey Bill: Just leave everything the way it comes out of Writelog. Its fine the way it is, you will only get point credit for one QSO. The judges will only let you count one of the QSOs. You just don'; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-02/msg00131.html (8,202 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] correct way to handle dupes??? (score: 1): Author: w9ol@dataflo.net (Bill Heinzinger); Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 07:56:31 -0600; ... Yes but what I can't understand is that if the previous but possibly incorrect qso has the points attached, it is incorrect. One of the two qsos did not take place. Assuming the other op is corre; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-02/msg00139.html (8,090 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]