Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+fast\s+re\-start\s+of\s+WriteLog\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] fast re-start of WriteLog (score: 1)
Author: eric@k3na.org (Eric Scace K3NA)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:33:11 -0500
During the WW CW weekend I used WL for the first time in a multi-op environment. On rare occasions one could be confronted with the need to re-boot a computer in the middle of a contest. In our multi
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00524.html (10,178 bytes)

2. [WriteLog] fast re-start of WriteLog (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:09:51 -0500
logging in the middle of a contest? www.macroexpress.com
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00525.html (7,691 bytes)

3. [WriteLog] fast re-start of WriteLog (score: 1)
Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:31:22 -0500
Just to confirm what Eric said, my experience was similar durig this past CQWW CW where I ran WriteLog for the first time in a network configuration. At first, it worked perfectly, but then, my main
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00526.html (12,981 bytes)

4. [WriteLog] fast re-start of WriteLog (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:16:16 -0500
given this problem. I expect several will chime in to defend WL in a networked environment. My experience is limited to 2 CQWWRTTY contests with 2 networked computers. Computer A is recent with WIN2
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00528.html (8,821 bytes)

5. [WriteLog] fast re-start of WriteLog (score: 1)
Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry )
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:53:24 -0500
Guys, While I, too, would like to see a more streamlined process, it's not THAT bad. For example, after my fiasco of setting up a WPX log by mistake, I shut down at 0004Z to create new CQWW logs from
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00529.html (14,347 bytes)

6. [WriteLog] fast re-start of WriteLog (score: 1)
Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:02:03 -0500
Thanks for taking the time for your detailed response John. I do have a couple of questions / comments below: That's understandable, and expected. However, if I'm going to set up a network of say, 8
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00530.html (9,429 bytes)

7. [WriteLog] fast re-start of WriteLog (score: 1)
Author: gbaron@charter.net (Gil Baron)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:07:04 -0600
And don't forget it does a poor job of remembering configuration, like font setting, cluster tings, etc. At least it does for me and I would like others to check that to see if I am alone here? Resta
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00531.html (12,090 bytes)

8. [WriteLog] fast re-start of WriteLog (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:12:34 +0000
Well, a little better than a guess, but I think you nailed the problem as above. Some screen savers simply do not scan the keyboard or mouse for an interrupt ( back to business ) after a certain peri
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00532.html (7,923 bytes)

9. [WriteLog] fast re-start of WriteLog (score: 1)
Author: steve@stevebb.com (Steve B)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 19:10:10 -0000
am Sorry Gil I disagree with you mate !!! I have never had that problem happen at all Gil. Or maybe I am just one of those "saddo's" that actually reads the instructions front to back ;-) Though I o
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00535.html (8,214 bytes)

10. [WriteLog] fast re-start of WriteLog (score: 1)
Author: gbaron@charter.net (Gil Baron)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:36:16 -0600
I agree here and that is why I use it instead of the former TRLOG. It just is that it has the problem I stated in a previous post that it does not remember those settings. You have to CHANGE the fon
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00537.html (9,769 bytes)

11. FW: [WriteLog] fast re-start of WriteLog (score: 1)
Author: gbaron@charter.net (Gil Baron)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:25:37 -0600
SORRY for posting this. It was meant as a private reply . To avoid the somewhat arrogant reply I did not leave it here, sorry again. _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing l
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00540.html (8,558 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu