Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+ptt\s+and\s+rig\s+control\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+ptt\s+and\s+rig\s+control\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] ptt and rig control (score: 1): Author: sjwoodr@yahoo.com (Steve Woodruff); Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:38:47 -0800 (PST); Is it possible to have PTT and rig control on separate serial ports? I have checked the WL archives but didn't see anyone trying that exactly. Also experimented in WL by setting rig control on one co; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00179.html (7,646 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] ptt and rig control (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:56:20 -0500; Sure - That's what I usually do. I have rig control on one port and a FSK/PTT cable on another. Works fine. I could also do PTT via CAT rig control, but I don't usually do it that way. I think you w; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00180.html (8,027 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] ptt and rig control (score: 1): Author: sjwoodr@yahoo.com (Steve Woodruff); Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 12:04:17 -0800 (PST); Hi John, Ok here's the setup: i built a cw + ci-v interface which i have connected to LPT1 and COM4 respectively. I also have COM1 connected to a sound card interface, primarily just for PTT control.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00181.html (9,142 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] ptt and rig control (score: 1): Author: gbaron@charter.net (Gil Baron); Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 15:27:18 -0600; PTT on a separate port works fine for me. COM 2 selected for CW and it does not matter what rig is selected. PTT set to YES. All Mode PTT on CW port RTS selected. I do think it is not well done as a; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00182.html (9,015 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] ptt and rig control (score: 1): Author: sjwoodr@yahoo.com (Steve Woodruff); Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:32:42 -0800 (PST); Gil, Is this working because your CW ptt is kicking in? when i turn my sound card interface off, hitting F3 plays my wav file... but i can't get it to trigger the PTT on com1 when com4 is my "rig". I; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00183.html (10,127 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] ptt and rig control (score: 1): Author: sjwoodr@yahoo.com (Steve Woodruff); Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:35:28 -0800 (PST); As a follow-up to my last note -- if i tell WL that i have com1 set as my **CW** port then it does use the PTT=yes setting. So Gil, can you do rig control on one port and SSB PTT on another if you ar; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00184.html (7,695 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] ptt and rig control (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:20:14 -0500; Steve, it doesn't work that way. When you check the RIG box and set PTT = YES, you are telling WL to do PTT via CAT control - which you have on COM 4. If you want PTT on com 1, you need to indicate; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00185.html (8,095 bytes)
8. [WriteLog] ptt and rig control (score: 1): Author: sjwoodr@yahoo.com (Steve Woodruff); Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:26:59 -0800 (PST); Ok. Not exactly what i was trying to say. But i'll just rebuild my interface to use a serial port for cw keying and then choose all mode ptt via RTS or whatever and that will solve my problem. I just; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00186.html (8,956 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]