Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+FT\-1000D\s+vs\s+FT\-1000MP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+FT\-1000D\s+vs\s+FT\-1000MP\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] FT-1000D vs FT-1000MP (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: 28 Jan 1997 19:32:24 -0700; Which one is better? Would you buy a new MP or try to find a used D? What are the preferred Serial Numbers for each? Do you use the sub band receiver much? Any input greatly appreciated. Mike W0MU --; /archives//html/Yaesu/1997-01/msg00038.html (7,628 bytes)
2. [Yaesu] FT-1000D vs FT-1000MP (score: 1): Author: k3mm@erols.com (Tyler G Stewart ); Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 04:06:53 -0000; I like the MP's better because of the receiver and the versatility. I think the RX is a little more bulletproof and versatile with the multiple preamps and DSP. It also has menu selection of a lot of; /archives//html/Yaesu/1997-01/msg00039.html (9,502 bytes)
3. [Yaesu] FT-1000D vs FT-1000MP (score: 1): Author: kb3aug@juno.com (Bill Hinkle); Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 19:55:28 PST; On 28 Jan 1997 19:32:24 -0700 "Fatchett, Mike" <Fatchett.Mike@tci.com> writes: Mike, I have a 1000D and it is a nice rig. I wasn't to impressed with the receiver. My FT-767 hears just as well, I thin; /archives//html/Yaesu/1997-01/msg00042.html (8,375 bytes)
4. [Yaesu] FT-1000D vs FT-1000MP (score: 1): Author: don_gaikins@partyline.net (Don Gaikins); Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 17:57:03 -0600; Don Gaikins W0VM don_gaikins@partyline.net -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/yaesufaq.html Submissions: yaesu@contesting.com Administrative requests: yaesu-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: ke7; /archives//html/Yaesu/1997-01/msg00053.html (8,077 bytes)
5. [Yaesu] FT-1000D vs FT-1000MP (score: 1): Author: Anestis@mail.dec.com (George Anestis); Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 08:37:18 -0500; The price difference between the D and the MP is really very small. The price of the basic MP does not include six (yep, 6!) optional filters, and the TCXO. Add it up....not much difference at all. I; /archives//html/Yaesu/1997-01/msg00055.html (9,345 bytes)
6. [Yaesu] FT-1000D vs FT-1000MP (score: 1): Author: jlockj@minn.net (John Lockhart); Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 09:10:58 -0600; Just an (another) observation...I run an "MP" now with all filters.....also had a "D".....preferred the "MP"....... sold the "D". 73, John W0DC -- 'Don Gaikins' <don_gaikins@partyline.net> To: <yaesu; /archives//html/Yaesu/1997-01/msg00058.html (10,537 bytes)
7. [Yaesu] FT-1000D vs FT-1000MP (score: 1): Author: PChristensen@Continental.com (PChristensen@Continental.com); Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 10:43:30 -0500; I echo John's observations. I sold my FT-1000D last year, purchased the technically superior "MP," and even had a couple-hundred $$$ of extra spending money left over. -Paul, W9AC To: <yaesu@contesti; /archives//html/Yaesu/1997-01/msg00060.html (12,178 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]