- 1. [Yaesu] Ft-1000mp Mark V (score: 1)
- Author: kq0b@sprintmail.com (Michael W. Elliott)
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 19:22:15 -0600
- Would anyone be willing to share their menu settings with me for the Mark V ??? I have all filters installed in main and sub-receiver Interested in best settings for cw and ssb
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2002-03/msg00042.html (6,289 bytes)
- 2. [Yaesu] FT-1000MP Mark V (score: 1)
- Author: Sam_Stimson@Dell.com (Sam_Stimson@Dell.com)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:22:36 -0600
- I am considering buying a new rig and the Mark V looks like a good upgrade from the FT-920 I presently own. The Mark V has been out there for a little over 6 months now and I was wondering if anyone
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2001-01/msg00019.html (7,047 bytes)
- 3. [Yaesu] FT-1000MP Mark V (score: 1)
- Author: abarstad@bconnex.net (Are Barstad)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:44:25 -0500
- For the money I would much rather buy a FT-1000D. The 'D' is a bit more, but for a reason... much better rig. The MK-V may have more digital features but lacking good mechanical filters (at least tha
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2001-01/msg00020.html (8,611 bytes)
- 4. [Yaesu] FT-1000MP Mark V (score: 1)
- Author: Tony.Seaton@turner.com (Seaton, Tony )
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:20:02 -0500
- Are I had a 1000D loaded with all filters and with outboard Timewave DSP for 7 years(updated by Yaesu in 98) and bought a MkV in Sep of 00. I operated both rigs for a month and I can tell you there i
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2001-01/msg00021.html (9,693 bytes)
- 5. [Yaesu] FT-1000MP Mark V (score: 1)
- Author: hfshack@hotmail.com (Geos Major)
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 08:37:35 -0500
- I spent some time doing a side by side eval. of the MV vs. the MP using the same antenna under actual operating conditions. Hands down, the MP yep the MP) plays nicer and has more sensitive and selec
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2001-01/msg00022.html (7,860 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu