Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+FT\-1000MP\s+sub\-keying\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] FT-1000MP sub-keying (score: 1)
Author: n4Lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 16:15:14 -0800
Has anyone else noticed the crummy sounding transmit keying when using the sub receiver? Listen to yourself some time while using the sub receiver as the primary rx. n4lq -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.co
/archives//html/Yaesu/1997-01/msg00049.html (6,955 bytes)

2. [Yaesu] FT-1000MP sub-keying (score: 1)
Author: paulc@ccse.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 17:20:07 -0500
--5A6E53682A0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Yep. It is distinctively different. Anyone know why? -Paul, W9AC --5A6E53682A0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
/archives//html/Yaesu/1997-01/msg00050.html (7,605 bytes)

3. [Yaesu] FT-1000MP sub-keying (score: 1)
Author: n4Lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington)
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 18:30:03 -0800
My guess is the extra processor time required to switch between frequencies. The MP's sub receiver isn't a totally seperate system as it is in the 1000d. Most radios have the same problem especially
/archives//html/Yaesu/1997-01/msg00051.html (7,545 bytes)

4. [Yaesu] FT-1000MP sub-keying (score: 1)
Author: jlockj@minn.net (John Lockhart)
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 08:55:02 -0600
Hi Steve and Group, I prefer the sound of the sidetone with the sub-receiver on.....also allows you to adjust the sidetone volume without using control on the rear of the 1000MP. I'll have to check a
/archives//html/Yaesu/1997-01/msg00057.html (7,589 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu