- 1. [Yaesu] FT1000D broadcast (score: 1)
- Author: "Willem Braeckevelt" <on5jy@village.uunet.be>
- Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 02:46:11 +0200
- Dr oms , Any help on my FT1000D i have in evening hours strong broadcasting interference on 17m 30m and little on 20m ? If i put 40m dipole on 20m 17m 30m bands also broadcasting come up? Any idea wh
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2004-10/msg00006.html (6,483 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D broadcast (score: 1)
- Author: Robin Thompson <robin@g3tkf.freeserve.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 09:19:48 +0100
- In message <000f01c4ad99$602697c0$60c8eb3e@Willem>, Willem Braeckevelt <on5jy@village.uunet.be> writes Dr oms , Any help on my FT1000D i have in evening hours strong broadcasting interference on 17m
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2004-10/msg00007.html (7,314 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D broadcast (score: 1)
- Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
- Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 19:19:30 +0200
- The noise blanker IMD problem will cause 3:rd order IMD, this is not the case here. This problem is poor 2:nd order IMD performance due to bad PIN diodes in the bandpass filter switching. Fix is to r
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2004-10/msg00008.html (8,012 bytes)
- 4. [Yaesu] FT1000D broadcast (score: 1)
- Author: dk9py@t-online.de (Armin Sturm)
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:30:27 +0200
- The best way to eliminate the 2nd order IM in the FT1000D is to have the TX tuner in the RX path as well. There was a mod disclosed by myself in CQ/DL 1994, with drawings etc. This is in use since th
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2004-10/msg00015.html (7,073 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu