Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+FT920\s+vs\s+870S\s+vs\s+Omni\s+6\+\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+FT920\s+vs\s+870S\s+vs\s+Omni\s+6\+\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] FT920 vs 870S vs Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: enboe@juno.com (Eric N Boe); Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 19:55:48 -0700; To the group: I have an FT920 and am considering the upgrade to the Omni or Kenwood. Any thoughts (objective is better). Thanks. Eric (K0AVW) _________________________________________________________; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-07/msg00049.html (7,602 bytes)
2. [Yaesu] FT920 vs 870S vs Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: lanej@provide.net (John Lane); Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 07:47:40 -0400; Personally I wouldn't consider the radios you mention to be an upgrade to the FT-920. They are really in the same class. For something better I would suggest the FT-1000MP/D, TS-950SDX , IC-775 or so; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-07/msg00050.html (8,578 bytes)
3. [Yaesu] FT920 vs 870S vs Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: davidho@one.net (David Ho (de AF4BH)); Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 11:20:34 -0400 (EDT); Eric, I don't know, collectively, what feature(s) you are looking for in terms of an upgrade. It must have been somethings that you like about the FT-920 when you bought it. Now that you like the oth; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-07/msg00051.html (9,792 bytes)
4. [Yaesu] FT920 vs 870S vs Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: w5robert@blkbox.com (Robert W5AJ); Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 23:49:10 -0500; Eric, Recommend you visit the ARRL web site which compiles their rig test results there. SADLY the last update of that was 16 Dec 1992 - so the FT-920 is not listed. IF you live by the numbers you wo; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-07/msg00053.html (8,347 bytes)
5. [Yaesu] FT920 vs 870S vs Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: kg0us@swbell.net (David Rich); Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 11:13:43 -0500; "IF you live by the numbers you would probably not get the 950SDX or 775 as the reported dynamic range is lower than MP (or 1000D)." The test report for the IC-775DSP can be found on page 67 of Janua; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-07/msg00054.html (9,053 bytes)
6. [Yaesu] FT920 vs 870S vs Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: w5robert@blkbox.com (Robert W5AJ); Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 21:10:30 -0500; ok just so we are apples to apples, you are quoting the blocking DR while I was quoting the two-tone,3rd order IMD DR. Different. 73 Robert "IF you live by the numbers you would probably not get the; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-07/msg00055.html (9,875 bytes)
7. [Yaesu] FT920 vs 870S vs Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: lanej@provide.net (John Lane); Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1998 09:05:03 -0400; If it were me I'd buy the Yaesu. Yaesu service and support is superior to Icom and I've had many problems with Icom radios in the past. My experience with the IC-211 would be enough to swear off Icom; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-07/msg00058.html (7,744 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]