Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+MP\s+or\s+D\s+\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+MP\s+or\s+D\s+\?\?\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] MP or D ??? (score: 1): Author: litwins@badsector.com (Litwins); Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 15:47:54 GMT; GM all; I'm new to this ref so don't know protocall etc so pse bear w/me. I'm excited! XYL has given GO for purch of new xcvr after almost 20 yrs using the good ol' 101ZD!! Life is short, so I'm goin; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00018.html (7,756 bytes)
2. [Yaesu] MP or D ??? (score: 1): Author: bzuehlke@seren.com (Zuehlke, Brad); Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 11:26:52 -0500; Hi Steve... Lucky you... a new, high end transceiver with the wife's blessing. I had a fully loaded FT-1000D for about 5 years before switching to the fully loaded MP. My bottom line opinion is that; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00020.html (9,800 bytes)
3. [Yaesu] MP or D ??? (score: 1): Author: SEREIKAS@worldnet.att.net (George Sereikas); Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 14:58:02 -0400; Hello Steve, I don't think you can go wrong with either radio....they are both excellent. I have owned both and actually had them operating side-by-side for awhile. I ended up keeping the 1000MP. I t; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00021.html (9,987 bytes)
4. [Yaesu] MP or D ??? (score: 1): Author: DJ2001@aol.com (DJ2001); Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 16:21:49 EDT; I've had them both and now own and use a FT1000MP. If I had it to do all over again again then I would still pick the MP, no doubt about it for me. You have slower tuning on the MP. which is adjustab; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00023.html (8,173 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]