Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+QUERY\s+TO\s+THOS\s+CLAIMING\s+A\s+FT1000D\s+INTERMOD\s+PROBLEM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+QUERY\s+TO\s+THOS\s+CLAIMING\s+A\s+FT1000D\s+INTERMOD\s+PROBLEM\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] QUERY TO THOS CLAIMING A FT1000D INTERMOD PROBLEM (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us (Robert Wanderer); Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 17:56:28 -0800; What position is the FRONT END control? You may have an overload condition if you're using NOR. What happens when you switch to IPO or the 6 or 12 dB ATTEN posiitions? I've a fairly older model and I; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00040.html (7,324 bytes)
2. [Yaesu] QUERY TO THOS CLAIMING A FT1000D INTERMOD PROBLEM (score: 1): Author: james119@iu.net (James M.); Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 22:44:40 -0800; It makes no difference what position the front end is on, or the Rf gain setting. And the NB is off. This is apparently intermod or similar effect in the IF Unit, probably associated with one of the; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00042.html (8,718 bytes)
3. [Yaesu] QUERY TO THOS CLAIMING A FT1000D INTERMOD PROBLEM (score: 1): Author: par@magg.net (Dale R. Parfitt); Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 11:39:34 -0500; intermod in the FT650 and later in the FT736R. In both instances it turned out to be the noise blanker being gated by signals in its wide passband. Turning it off 'cleared' the band. Unfortunately, o; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00044.html (8,044 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]