Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+ft1000d\s+vs\s+MK\s+V\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+ft1000d\s+vs\s+MK\s+V\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] ft1000d vs MK V (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 20:30:44 EST; Hey gang, I just got done using my ft1000d for the 1st time in crowded band cndx during the SS, & was less than impressed. To be honest, I prefer my ICOM 746 over this thing, due to the auto-notch &; /archives//html/Yaesu/2004-11/msg00012.html (6,394 bytes)
2. RE: [Yaesu] ft1000d vs MK V (score: 1): Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:29:09 -0500; Yes, the notch is not great on the 1000D. But otherwise they are about equal in performance. I would hate to give up the option of being able to receive on 2 different bands even though I might not u; /archives//html/Yaesu/2004-11/msg00013.html (7,885 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]