Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+ft920\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+ft920\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: silver@ax.apc.org (PT2HO); Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 09:48:21 -0300; Dear friends, I intend to replace my FT757GX II for another radio and I am considering the following: 1) FT-920 2) IC-756 3) IC-746 I would like to hear comments about these radios. I am mainly inter; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00050.html (7,860 bytes)
2. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: DJ2001@aol.com (DJ2001); Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 13:50:31 EDT; Buy an Icom, the MP's have to be "mod'ed" all the time and they always seem to have new "bugs" and problems. If I were you I wouldent buy one (MP), especally a used one because of all the mods and di; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00055.html (7,533 bytes)
3. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: wu2m@qsl.net (Rocco Conte); Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 22:50:01 -0400; Am I missing somthing here??? The FT920 is not a MP. By the way, I have not done any mods to my 1 year old MP nor have I had a problem with it. I had a Icom 756 side by side with my MP for a while, t; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00056.html (8,438 bytes)
4. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: k8js@juno.com (John P Skubick); Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 23:38:59 -0400; Interesting comment from an ICOM owner, eh? My own experiances with ICOM have been not too good over the years. When they work, they work well. When they "break", notice I said "when" not "if", when; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00057.html (9,370 bytes)
5. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: lane@glerl.noaa.gov (John Lane); Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 20:50:27 -0400; My (and everyone else's) experience with the IC-211 was enough to cure me of ever wanting another ICOM. W8KX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.qsl.net/k7on/yaesu.html Submissions: yaesu@contesting.com Admini; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00062.html (10,311 bytes)
6. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: w4zw@home.com (Jon, W4ZW); Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 12:54:02 -0400; Interesting comments about Yaesu vs. Icom. I have owned both in several models and still have the Yaesu FT-1000D and FT-1000MP and also the ICOM 756 and the 706 here in Florida. My experience has bee; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00064.html (8,468 bytes)
7. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: DJ2001@aol.com (DJ2001); Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 13:06:20 EDT; Good..... I'm happy to hear of someone having success with the Yaesu. All I ever hear on this network is problems, bugs, mods ect. I have a MP also along with a 775. I use the MP...what does that tel; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00065.html (7,781 bytes)
8. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: lane@glerl.noaa.gov (John Lane); Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 01:50:55 -0400; In a forum like this problems and bugs are what your likely to hear. Perhaps the newer ICOM's are better but many of the older units I have owned have had serious problems. My most serious gripe (alt; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00066.html (9,367 bytes)
9. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: KR4DAGRIP@aol.com (KR4DA GRIP); Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 14:56:19 EDT; << Sender: owner-yaesu@contesting.com To: lane@glerl.noaa.gov, k8js@juno.com CC: silver@ax.apc.org, yaesu@contesting.com Good..... I'm happy to hear of someone having success with the Yaesu. All I ev; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00067.html (8,400 bytes)
10. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: KR4DAGRIP@aol.com (KR4DA GRIP); Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 15:04:34 EDT; << And my Ft 990 is pretty good radio also......there are alot more radios without problems then with by a far margin. As a computer tech I think all computer(s) are crap but that all I see everyday; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00068.html (7,817 bytes)
11. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: DJ2001@aol.com (DJ2001); Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 17:07:11 EDT; Hmmm, Maybe I'm getting this group mixed up with the Icom group. Looking at that one there seems to be a lot of modify'n go'n on too...I just dont know what the heck to think...are folks just looking; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00069.html (7,485 bytes)
12. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: clive@gm3poi.prestel.co.uk (clive penna); Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 01:05:49 +0100; Can anyone run a check on there FT920 with a cw filter fitted. By injecting a signal on say 20m @ S9+10db in the narrow cw mode either lsb or usb and tell me whether they can still hear that signal 4; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-04/msg00033.html (6,978 bytes)
13. [Yaesu] ft920 (score: 1): Author: dennis_edey@interworx.com.au (dennis edey); Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 06:32:17 +1000; Hello all,iam interested in the broad band mod for the FT920 i have a couple of mods here but havn't attempted any as yet,the s/n is 71060394 was in the first batch into VK, i think th e"pin" number; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-04/msg00049.html (6,983 bytes)
14. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: wm7d@wm7d.net (Mark A. Downing); Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 21:50:30 -0700; I have been maintaining a web page about the FT920, including my experiences with the radio in a journal. I have been collecting owner comments as well, and would like to ask the list for comments ab; /archives//html/Yaesu/1997-09/msg00068.html (6,757 bytes)
15. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: par@magg.net (Dale R. Parfitt); Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 17:13:02 -0400; Hi, I am interested in the 920 as an IF for 1296 EME. Does anyone know if this rig has a separate RX ANT socket? And, of course, any impressions? Dale W4OP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.qsl.net/k7on/yaes; /archives//html/Yaesu/1997-07/msg00015.html (6,534 bytes)
16. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: mdowning@rdatasys.com (Mark A. Downing); Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 14:25:31 -0700; It should work just fine. There is a separate RX antenna connection available (and it can be used with a pre amp too). I have an ongoing "diary" of thoughts about my FT920 on my web page: http://www.; /archives//html/Yaesu/1997-07/msg00016.html (7,282 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]